These articles always read as "bla bla bla fusion bla bla neutrinos bla bla zero environmental impact bla bla billion percent capacity improvement" and nothing ever seems to hit the shelves. We've had world changing breakthroughs in battery tech every single week for the last 30 years, it seems.
I'd expect scientific articles to be more professional than to engage in clickbait and engagement spam but I guess they're not I suppose...
It’s because articles about a 7% improvement in battery capacity aren’t as exciting, but those have been happening every year and the results compound over time. Eg check out this graph:
https://rockymntstage.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/slide-2-battery-charts.png
I can go on amazon right now and buy a 1kWh battery for close to $100 which is crazy cheap compared to even a couple years ago
It's an imperative need of it to search better alternatives to Lithium, because Lithium is a very dangerous metal (drill a lithium battery and you'll see ☠️) with severe environment, economic and policy impact. Not a solution for sostainable energy, Every investigation for alternatives are welcome.
its research porn. it and they are wasting our time. there is never any serious attempt to pass on any knowhow
one recipe to make pancakes will have more impact on the world than 100M of these nonsense research porn announcements hiding behind paywalls
Science
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage