-2
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Someone has pointed out it would be lot easier for AI to replace a CEO then a developer.

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Coding is totally obselete, bro. AI can totally write all the code, trust me bro. You just gotta know how to tell it what code to write, like learn some keywords and stuff, bro. Like, as long as you check how it produces looping mechanisms and tell it when it should use polymorphism and stuff, it'll totally do all the work bro. You don't need to know how to code, just the right sequence of keywords and commands so the AI can write all the code.

[-] grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

I installed Manjaro on one of my computers and I wanted to see, if ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Mistral where useful in eliminating some quirks you always encounter after a fresh install. So I asked them whenever I stumbled upon an issue how I could solve that issue.

None, I’d like to emphasise this: NONE of their tips was helpful.

And Mr Masad wants me to believe AIs would be able to program whole applications within a year?

MUAHAHAHA

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

As a coder, the majority of my job isn't writing code. It's translating the bullshit management says and the broken specs we're given into what they both actually want, not what they said. There is never going to be an AI that fixes that

[-] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The idea of LLMs putting coders out of work at a large scale seems inherently self-defeating.

The LLMs needed to ingest a massive volume of code to get to their current level of proficiency. What will happen if they put all the coders out of work and Stack Overflow is down to just a small number of hobbyists? Will the LLMs just stop advancing?

I'm sure Sam Altman would say they are just about to have reasoning capabilities that will allow them to improve. But Sam Altman is not credible.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

AI won't code everything by next year, blnot inn5 years either as it requires understanding context and actual reasoning which AI doesn't have and won't have for a long time to come, but the day that AI can code itself is the day that humanity is done for

[-] singletona@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Waiting for AI to take over CEO positions because they do nothing and you can replace them with a series of shell scripts.

Who is this guy? Some CEO ? Isn’t it more cost effective to replace him with ai?

[-] Tea@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago

There is no AI products to replace CEOs, currently?

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Literally any chatbot, probably

[-] JackDark@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

As a developer, I literally laughed hard enough to choke a little.

[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I actually dare them to try. I'm really looking forward to the massive paychecks I'm going to get when companies are panicking to try to untangle all the absolute nonsense bullshit these AI companies are about to unleash into corporate codebases. The AI-slop bugfest will make the Y2K issue seem trivial. I'm so excited, the future looks very bright for human software developers.

My advice: Practice going over other people's code with a fine-tooth comb looking for bad architecture, flaws and inefficiencies. You won't always be right, you won't find them all, but you'll learn lots of skills you'll need in the future. Whatever you do, don't undersell yourselves, remember that your experience is valuable, and AI has no experience, it just has a huge library it can shotgun "solutions" out of. Half the time they don't even compile, nevermind work properly, or efficiently.

[-] JackDark@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

My advice: Practice going over other people's code with a fine-tooth comb looking for bad architecture, flaws and inefficiencies.

I agree. Funny story, I wasn't allowed to do code reviews at my current job for about 2 years because they thought my comb was too fine. Suddenly software quality is something they are really valuing and they're allowing me to do code reviews again. Funny, that.

[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah when I first started there was one guy whose code reviews I dreaded, he would nitpick every detail and he would stand by it, he would tell me to do it a completely different way that was 10x more work. It felt like I would never get my stories done because I had drawn "that asshole" in the code review lottery.

Years later, I came to realize that he was actually the best, he taught me so much about the way I should be thinking of things and structuring things, that have saved so much time and trouble later on, I now specifically reach out to him for a review when I am trying to do something complex because I know he's going to give me an honest, thorough and useful review. Nobody's doing anyone any favours in the long run by rubber stamping things, it may help you keep your sprint velocity up, but it's not going to result in high quality code, and the bad quality code will inevitably bite you.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
-2 points (33.3% liked)

Technology

68528 readers
2810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS