20

Lithium-ion is what the capitalists want you to use.

Nickel-hydrogen is three times heavier per unit of energy stored. Oh no. Sounds terrible. But it's –

  • Cheap. $83 per kilowatt-hour (https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1809344115)

  • Lasts 20,000 cycles compared to 400-1200 for lithium-ion, so far fewer will have to be produced and disposed of.

  • Materials. This is the big one. Lithium is rare. It costs a lot of energy to mine, and mining produces a lot of wastewater and CIA coups. Nickel is abundant and cheaper, and causes less damage.

Nickely-hydrogen batteries are for applications where you want something good enough and care about the planet. Lithium-ion is when you need luxury and don't care about externalities.

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FanonFan@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Lot of applications where weight isn't an issue too.

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What about volume?

Hold on so electric vehicles will only last 1200 days and then you have to buy another huge battery?

[-] edge@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe when the EU forces user replaceable batteries these will be common 3rd party alternative replacements.

[-] equinox@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Accounting for weight, does it otherwise last as long as lithium-ion batteries?

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23313 readers
57 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS