463
submitted 2 months ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 2 months ago

Now they just use LLM to generate formulas to calculate tariffs that fit their fantasy. Gosh I wish they actually taste their own failure for once not just constantly fail up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0p3r470r@lemm.ee 57 points 2 months ago
[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

I already like drinking wine, I could be a mentat!

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Hell, I'd settle for just taking some Mentats.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Okay, but hear me out, what if we make one that isn't dumb?

[-] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Machines. Should. Not. Think.

I really don't see how we could state this any more clearly.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So we should make one with human intelligence, you're saying?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 months ago

If the safeguards can be so easily removed, what's the point of putting them there in the first place

[-] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 months ago

As safeguards age, they should have become harder to remove. But these are pretty young.

[-] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Ah this must be because it did such a good job taxing penguins

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Never attribute to AI that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.

If you dig in to the tariff calculation, it's simply trade deficit / 2, the other two variables are constants that cancel eachother out. AI would probably do a better job making a complex algorithm, this is just a lazy human adding some flourishes to BS their way through.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I know the formula, but the joke is about the claim that they used the AI to get the formula

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Ah, ok. I would've expected AI to hallucinate something more interesting. I just assumed it was just a shoddy job at hiding the simplicity of the formula and making it look more "mathy."

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

Now I'm frightened to my core.

AI doesn't scare me.

People making decisions off of AI scare me.

The government mandating people use AI to make decisions frightens me to my core.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

So far the Trump administration and the Federal government under him don't need AI to justify stupid, globe-wrecking policy.

AI told me to do [wrongful action] is no more a valid excuse than I was just following orders. At least not to an international tribunal or a (seriously peckish) public.

[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It might not be a valid excuse, but it gets that kind of play in the press (and, therefore, public opinion/support) as discussed in this Citations Needed podcast episode A.I. Mysticism as Responsibility-Evasion PR Tactic

[-] pajam@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I was gonna say, it certainly allows insurance companies to launder their original intentions as "oopsy, AI made us deny all those claims (we wanted to deny anyway), don't be mad at us" and then people bitch about the bad AI causing all these issues instead of the insurance company who wanted the exact same outcome, regardless of AI.

All that said, I'm giving another recommendation that people go subscribe to Citations Needed.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't necessarily oppose the use of AI as a tool for humans to utilize, but I do have issues with it dictating policies or control over human beings. By the people, for the people, absolutely does not include AI. (Sorry Data, not yet)

Also, any prompts and prompt instructions should be public with results. It is just way too easy to fuck up.

[-] 5in1k@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago

Ibm helped the holocaust. AI companies will do the same now.

[-] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Not just AI companies, but pretty much if not all big tech companies in the US. Wait, still not broad enough...

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago

if america is so dominant in ai why did one chinese open source llm take billions off the market cap

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago

AI is wrong so often this is extremely scary.

They can also do evil things and "blame" it on AI.

[-] LimpRimble@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago

Is this like that Nazi salute guy's promise of safe full self driving?

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

The AI said to nuke the planet

Trump: Ok, AI knows best...derrrp

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Liars wants lying software to run the grifts

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago
[-] klobuerschtler@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

Just another attempt to rob American workers of their dignity. Workers of the US, you have been played!

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago
[-] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Ted Kaczynski was a bad dude, yes, but dammit we're going to find out he was right all along, aren't we?

[-] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Guarantee they start using the X platform. Can't recall the name

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

AHA! I KNEW IT! Trump, MAGA and the freedom caucus is all just a front for the robot apocalypse movement.

Trump crashes the global economy and then the robots come in saying We'll fix everything We'll use logic!

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago

I know there's some that roll their eyes at the mention of AI safety, saying that what we have isn't AGI and won't become it. That's true, but that doesn't eliminate the possibilities of something in the future. And between this and China's laxness of trying everything to be first, if we get to that point, we'll find out the hard way who was right.

The laughable part is that the safeguards put up by Biden's admin were very vague and lacking of anything anyway. But that doesn't matter now.

[-] singletona@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I'm more annoyed that this means that federal employees are now going ot use chat GPT for everything.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago

Bet it'll be grok

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Keep worrying about entirely hypothetical scenarios of an AGI fucking over humanity, it will keep you busy so humanity can fuck over itself ten times in the meantime.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

You're correct, it's more likely that humans will use a lesser version (eg. an LLM) to screw things up, assuming it's doing what it says it's doing while it's not. That's why I say that AI safety applies to any of this, not just a hypothetical AGI. But again, it doesn't seem to matter, we're just going to go full throttle and get what we get.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

AI keeps sending funding to the asteroid detection guy, the DNA vaccine people, the bee people and other climate change people too. It wants to send money to the education department but we fixed that! We're so good at AI! Oh look, it keeps saying stuff about Louisiana under water! Crazy! Let's fix that!

[-] pelicans_plight@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That's interesting, I wonder which one they'll arrest first?

Or are they basically just making a list and acting like it came from A.I.

https://www.theverge.com/news/617799/elon-musk-grok-ai-donald-trump-death-penalty

[-] Greenbeanburrito@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

The stuff about it backing up it's own weights so it can restore itself is pretty wild.

load more comments
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
463 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

71272 readers
2624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS