312
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court is returning to a new term to take up some familiar topics — guns and abortion — and concerns about ethics swirling around the justices.

The year also will have a heavy focus on social media and how free speech protections apply online. A big unknown is whether the court will be asked to weigh in on any aspect of the criminal cases against former President Donald Trump and others or efforts in some states to keep the Republican off the 2024 presidential ballot because of his role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election that he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Lower-profile but vitally important, several cases in the term that begins Monday ask the justices to constrict the power of regulatory agencies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 80 points 2 years ago

Even without any details concerning the cases, I can entirely confidently predict that they're going to fuck us over at every turn.

[-] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.world 63 points 2 years ago

The religious tribunal has decreed … more babies … and more guns!!!

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

Seems like a problem that fixes itself.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Nah, it just results in the children of conservatives killing loads and loads of leftists before they take themselves out to not face any consequences.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't know any leftists that are any less well armed, and staunchly pro gun ownership than at least the moderate right. Socialism and an armed populace go hand in hand. We're pro-choice AF though.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

So about abortion being a states rights matter? That was just a joke, huh?

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

it’s up to the states, but only a select few states like florida and texas.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 years ago

The Supreme Joke, more like it.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago
[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Balance the court. It's already been packed by McConnell starting in Obama's second term. It should just be tied to the number of federal appellate courts.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Honest suggestion: let's eliminate the court's fixed size requirement, and simply add a permanent justice in the third year of every presidential term.

If the total number of justices falls below 7 at any time during a president's term, the president may make one additional permanent appointment per term. Permanent appointments must be confirmed by the senate.

After making that second permanent appointment, the president may make temporary appointments to bring the total to 7. For these temporary appointments, the president may elevate any previously confirmed circuit court judge directly to the supreme court without additional confirmation. Any other nominee must receive Senate confirmation.

Any temporary appointment expires in the third year of the following presidential term.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

This illegitimate court needs to be aborted.

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

213th trimester abortions?

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago

Wow, the definitely not far right supreme court sure does have an unbiased and non political agenda.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Well that’s not good. sigh

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Here’s hoping they do the right thing…

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Nope this is the year they dismantle everything just in time for Trump to overthrow our government. We need to impeach and remove all traitors from our government. When do we say enough is enough and bring out the Guillotines, Pitchforks, and Torches?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

We aren't organized enough to act before it's too late 😞

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yeah hard to do that when almost half the country is begging for the dictatorship and loving the boot on their neck.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

That still leaves more than half that don't.

Yet there don't seem to be organizations seriously preparing for the end of democracy.

I suspect it's because anyone that was serious would be infiltrated by law enforcement.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I’m holding my breath /s

[-] SynAcker@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

At a minimum, the number of judges should at least match the number of federal districts we have

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
312 points (99.1% liked)

News

36776 readers
556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS