145
submitted 2 months ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

Digital media such as social media, messenger groups or comment columns in online media have a predominantly negative influence on political processes. They can encourage populist movements, increase polarization and undermine trust in institutions.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 months ago

It’s not the technology, it’s the businesses interests behind such technology.

We live in a time of robber barons and these are just their tools

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago

Profiteering off of outrage? Say it ain't so!

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I thought this was pretty mega fucken clear at this point.

[-] arakhis_@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

albert einstein quote about human stupidity

[-] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Pretty maga clear

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

“Digital media” is a hell of a weird way of saying “capitalism”

[-] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

Stop with the dumb questions already. The answer is any social media platform with inherent interests in selling user data or selling ads are willing to trade anything for more money now. If democratic processes get in the way then so be it to these wastes of oxygen. Now let’s start asking some meaningful questions please.

[-] wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

I'm glad this is finally being looked at because I've been saying this for years and I feel like the vast majority doesn't realize how bad this is.

If you look at social media use and the rise of the far right over the last 15 years, they pretty much go hand in hand. Sure, that isn't proof for anything, but it's alarming and needs to be studied further.

In Germany, we have safeguards that prevent a single media outlet to gain too much power over controlling the public opinion. We have this for TV stations, news papers etc. Just not social media. Because social media wasn't even on the horizon when this law was put in place.

I think it's insane that we just let foreign profit driven companies steer the public opinion and discourse in our society and we finally have to start to heavily regulate them.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

I think where social media is particularly insidious is the use of algorithms.

No normal person wakes up and thinks "I think we should bring back the Nazis", but like a post on Facebook about Remembrance Sunday or patriotism or even just catapults, and suddenly you're on a fast track to white supremacist groups.

I've seen people go from chewing out a stranger in the supermarket for whining about foreigners, to spreading made up rumours about immigrants killing white girls.

In the past you'd hear about hate groups when they're marching through London in Union Jack T-shirts, smashing curry shop windows. Social media lets people in on the bottom rung and ride it to that point.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'm not defending social media or its algorithms, but you've also got to look at what predated it. People used to get their news and information from news anchors and newspapers that were mouthpieces for capitalists and conservatives. So maybe not as extremist or even as effective at influence as a social media algorithm, but still not great. Personally, I don't want to go back to relying on corporate news outlets either.

[-] wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

In Europe we have public news broadcasters in every country, so relying on corporate news isn't a huge problem.

Anyway, a news outlet pushing propaganda and misinformation is not nearly as dangerous as a social media platform doing it via algorithm. The fact that the algorithm can give you exactly the kind of propaganda that will resonate with you is extremely dangerous.

Not saying privately owned news outlets with a huge reach aren't a problem, they definetely are, it's just a whole other dimension.

[-] gargolito@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

This is like looking at roadkill and declaring "cars are a threat to road crossing critters".

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Bullshit. It's not about digital. It's about who owns it.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Where have you been since 2016

[-] Migmog@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Digital media adds pleasure and value to my life. Democracy adds nothing but a bunch of bullshit noise about the opinions of people who I don't care regarding things that I don't care about. And then after all that nonsense clowning the bureaucrats just do what they were going to do anyways. All those bullshit opinions, the whole dog and pony show are just to get fuckwits to pull a level for them during a popularity contest cultural celebration not unlike primitives dancing around a fire to the sound of drums praying for rain. So, to be direct, I prefer digital media over democracy because digital media is valuable and democracy isn't.

[-] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club -3 points 2 months ago

Without digital media, we wouldn't see genocide in Gaza.

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
145 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

71448 readers
3070 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS