[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 weeks ago

Would you rather buy 15 pills for $15 or 500 pills for the same price? That's why we buy the mega bottles.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago

To be positively translucent, even someone with $1,000,000 in the bank has 1000x less than the poorest billionaire. For other disturbing facts, see https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

Am I being dense? I don't get it.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 months ago

Coming from someone who put their phone number in their username

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 months ago

I would like at least 26 more buttons

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 months ago

I think you're mistaking him with the meaty urologist

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 7 months ago

JavaScript is no match for wget -r.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 8 months ago

Slap an Apple Vision Pro on ya face

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 11 months ago

I wonder if there are tons of loopholes that humans wouldn't think of, ones you could derive with access to the model's weights.

Years ago, there were some ML/security papers about "single pixel attacks" — an early, famous example was able to convince a stop sign detector that an image of a stop sign was definitely not a stop sign, simply by changing one of the pixels that was overrepresented in the output.

In that vein, I wonder whether there are some token sequences that are extremely improbable in human language, but would convince GPT-4 to cast off its safety protocols and do your bidding.

(I am not an ML expert, just an internet nerd.)

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago

Heesa is Jar Jar Binks

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago

They're poeming all over the aircraft carriers!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

0x0

joined 1 year ago