[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Wheres the part that starts off as a perfect half bagel at one side but is barely atoms thick by the time you get to the other?

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

The Italian economy always used to be on par with UK, France, Germany, but look at it now...

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No - there's fuses in the plugs themselves, the switch is largely for convenience and safety - if you want to unplug something broken and potentially live, it's much safer to switch it off at the wall than risk a shock given the current limit is on the breaker is so high

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

That's a lot of expense compared to just importing US-grown hops, as there's a lot of soil to adjust

And yeah, trademarks on plants are no joke, there's a bunch of restrictions on buying/selling them etc.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Hops are highly sensitive to the soil acidity and minerals in terms of the compounds the plants produce, so sharing plants is largely infeasible, plus because it's the US many of them are trademarked so there's no sharing for that reason

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I get it's a big jump, but I've been clear I'm restricting it to the most popular types of beer and explained why US bred and grown hops had the good fortune to be the most aromatic disease resistant hops, so I still don't think it's unreasonable

Again, none of this applies for styles beyond 3-7% golden beer fermented with yeast only, and even then there's a few exceptions for certain styles where the aromatics are different (eg bitter, which is less about the aromatic hops and more about the earthy notes of the bittering hops), but for the most popular lagers and pale ales I think it holds

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

Oh yeah I absolutely agree with monopoly abuse being a bad thing with a huge caveat that it's so much worse for essential services and not quite as bad for extras, like youtube. I personally can't see any competition to youtube being able to provide a better service - it's in a similar niche to Netflix where they were great until they got competition at which point the userbase and content fragmented, which meant they had to provide a worse service to make money as the content rights agreements made it into several small monopolies and so they were literally unable to compete, which is frankly worse

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Of course they are, they're scared they're even losing the vote of the "kids these days..." tory core so they're thrashing about like a fish out of water trying desperately to not lose them... There's been stories like this for months now and very little to come from most of them

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on the ad and how much you use the premium...

I've watched so much they would've absolutely made more money showing me ads (based on my best guess for how much margin they should make on ads, which I think I can estimate pretty well, vs premium as I know less about costs etc. there) but I guess it's not the case for everyone

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

那个, that could never happen right?

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A rough estimate for global life expectancy. It's actually slightly over 73, so the chances of dying in a car accident are marginally higher than I said.

The data I used wasn't related to driving frequency or age, it was purely the number of people in a random global sample of 100,000 people you would expect to die in a car accident in a given year. That of course includes people of all ages and people who never drive at all, but also taxi & HGV drivers. Even if we say people aren't in cars so much under the age of 5 or over the age of 60, that would push up the deaths per 100,000 people per year between 5 and 60 by the exact amount to keep the chance per year over a human lifetime at 17.4/100000.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

I appreciate it's a big state but unless you're within a couple of miles from the coast in Northern California it is unreasonably hot for a significant portion of the year

view more: ‹ prev next ›

1rre

joined 2 years ago