[-] 312@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

The source is Counterpoint Research as linked in the article - the 55% figure in the headline is misleading, the statistic is really “55% of new devices shipped”, not total market share.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

It’s because the proposed changes would give the UK government de-facto authority to dictate how security and encryption are implemented.

…a provision that would give the UK government oversight of security changes to its products, including regular iOS software updates. The Home Office consultation proposes “mandating” operators to notify the home secretary of changes to a service that could have a “negative impact on investigatory powers”.

It would mean in practice that the UK would dictate how Apple employs encryption around the globe, unless Apple was willing to fork their software and build/maintain a UK-only branch for their products.

Which still wouldn’t solve the issue because if you interacted with someone over any of those protocols who was in the UK, your messages and data would be accessible by the UK government, regardless of the other party’s location.

I’m with Apple on this. This isn’t a consumer-focused piece of legislation for repairability/interoperability like some of the newer EU legislation, this is a government trying to ensure they have the technical ability to spy on their citizens and others. It’s the definition of anti-consumer.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

It’s not forced on you. If you don’t download Threads and log in, you’re not on threads.

This is akin to saying Google Calendar is “forced” on you if you have a Gmail account. They are separate services that use a common credential, you are under no obligation to use any or all of those services.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago

There’s plenty of things to hate Meta for, but this is inaccurate.

You log into Threads with your Instagram account. There’s no “shadow account”, you’re logging into a second service with the same account and credentials.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Your ticket entitles you to a seat, even if you don’t pick it yourself. You’ll just likely get stuck with a less desirable seat like a middle seat.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago

Damn we really are just doing a "kill everything web2.0" speedrun any%

[-] 312@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Yes, but I assume the OP is referring to lemmy-ui, which is the built-in frontend for desktop and mobile in the browser, which does not at this point support dynamic conversion of youtube links to embed cards AFAIK. App support of embeds will obviously be on a app-to-app basis.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago

Embedding videos doesn’t require local storage of videos. When you embed a YouTube video, you’re just linking a container which loads and displays the video from YouTube’s servers.

107
he play (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/cat@lemmy.world
3
The Emancipator (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
[-] 312@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

!newcommunities@lemmy.world is probably what you’re looking for

[-] 312@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

In order to quickly fix it they would probably have to roll back the change to require login to view tweets, which would be admitting that it wasn’t caused by “attacks” on Twitter, which Elon won’t do. Rock and a hard place.

[-] 312@lemm.ee 408 points 1 year ago

This is Musk’s “Reichstag Fire” moment for Twitter.

The rate limiting is not because of “extreme manipulation”, but because of piss-poor code that Twitter deployed as part of their change to only allow tweets to be viewed if logged in. Twitter is effectively DDoSing itself right now. But, it creates an opportunity for Musk to create a narrative.

These “temporary” limits will probably remain inevitably, as they provide another benefit to Twitter - they drive Blue subscriptions. Unfortunately, they also repel free users from using the platform entirely, and at a much higher ratio.

Twitter is going to become even more of a cesspool than it already is at an alarming rate. Crazy how many established social media platforms have decided to crumble at the exact same time.

1
rule (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] 312@lemm.ee 215 points 1 year ago

It's the pendulum swing of pretty much every community on Reddit.

  • Community starts out with a small group of users dedicated to quality content related to the topic
  • Community growth reaches a point where the most popular posts begin to trend outside of the community
  • New users join the community after seeing popular posts show up in their own feeds. Growth accelerates
  • Community becomes "popular" enough that posts regularly trend outside of the community
  • New users flood in
  • Users flood the community with low-effort content to karma farm
  • Community now sucks.

It happened to basically every big sub on Reddit once reaching a large enough size.

1
Jingleheimer(ule) (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
9
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
2
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
4
submitted 1 year ago by 312@lemm.ee to c/apple@lemmy.ml
15

In an effort to try and be mindful of storage usage on instances I'm posting to, I'd prefer to host images externally and link to them.

Now that Imgur has turned into.. whatever it is now, anyone have any good recommendations for simple, quick image hosts?

view more: next ›

312

joined 1 year ago