63
[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Definitely a mission to keep an eye on, but when Orion drive?

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Your personal hatred is blinding you, OP.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Hate to disappoint, but it's far more than you could possibly imagine. You could dump the equivalent mass of the entire human civilization, every single person and everything we've ever made, on the Moon and it wouldn't have a noticeable effect.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Sure. Why shouldn't gay guys and women have eye candy as well?

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because NASA, with nearly 30 billion in funding and using technology designed half a century ago, took 11 years to build a Shuttle cosplaying as a Saturn V. They were legally mandated to. That's not a dig at NASA, it's a dig at the morons who hold their purse strings.

In roughly the same timeframe, SpaceX developed two brand new engines, both of which have amazing performance in their weight class. They developed a reusable medium lift rocket that's now one of the most reliable launch vehicles ever. Now they're working on a fully reusable super heavy launcher that's capable of interplanetary missions. And they did all that without NASA's budget.

Private launch companies, of which SpaceX is only one, allow for faster development, faster innovation and cheaper launches. They're actually saving taxpayers money. And the amounts that NASA does pay them don't just vanish into the CEOs' pockets the moment the payment clears. It goes to engineers, maintenance workers, construction workers, caterers, everyone employed by these companies and their suppliers.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And the gravitational pull of all the other planets. I'm sure Jupiter is totally cool with us trying to precisely align and balance a satellite swarm on the point of a needle.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Even if the US and EU pony up the not insignificant amount of cash to do it, there's still nothing that can put 1000t into orbit, let alone L1. And splitting it up into 100t segments isn't a solution, since L1 is unstable. The segments will need power, thrusters, gyros, propellant and guidance for station-keeping, so there goes a large chunk of your mass budget. To compensate for that, you need more mirrors. And they need to be continuously replaced as they break down or run out of propellant.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Horizon: Zero Dawn. I got absolute shite aim on the best of days and playing on a controller just makes it worse. Switched to m+kb eventually, but by then, the experience was already marred. Think I'll give it some more time, then try again.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I took my old gaming rig and set it up in the living room. Hooked it straight to the TV, got a wireless keyboard and 4 controllers. Couch gaming, emulators, streaming, whatever the hell I want.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Most likely? Nostalgia and familiarity. We'll probably never know if the decision to make it Baldur's Gate 3 was WotC/Hasbro's or Larian's.

There's precedent, though. Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance had less of a connection to Bioware's BG than this one does.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And it shouldn't be. Baldur's Gate 1 and 2 are amazing games that pioneered or popularized many things we've come to expect in modern RPGs, but they're also 20+ years old. If Bioware's Baldur's Gate was released today, it wouldn't be revolutionary. It would be an excellently made throwback to how RPGs used to be.

BG3 isn't made by the same studio, let alone the same people. Their admiration of what they're building upon is clear as a sunny day, though. So let this carry on the spirit of what was and be the foundation of something new.

view more: next ›

Bimfred

joined 1 year ago