124
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by birdcat@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The news is full of it, excitement seems high, and I really don't get it. I'm not against space-related research, but why suddenly the moon? And why send people there? Can someone fill me in on what's to be gained or why one might be excited about it?

Allow me to use the linked article for my questions.

There have been three primary drivers of renewed interest in the Moon. The first was the discovery and confirmation in the 1990s and early 2000s that water ice is likely to exist at the lunar poles in permanently shadowed craters. The presence of abundant water, providing oxygen and hydrogen resources, has given space agencies a new reason to explore the poles.

Yea but so what? Hydrogen is literally the most common thing in the universe, no fucking way there is also some on the moon 🤯. Then what's so spectacular about moon ice, water, or even oxygen? And why does it need people to explore it?

A second factor has been the rise of China's space program, which has sent a series of ambitious robotic missions to the Moon that have both landed on the far side and returned samples from the lunar surface. China has made no secret of its interest in sending astronauts to the Moon, leading to competing efforts between NASA's Artemis Program and China's lunar station goals.

Again why? Is this some repetition of the Cold War Soviet-US competition?

Finally, there has been some interest from private companies in the commercial development of the lunar surface, both to exploit resources there but also for other purposes. This has stimulated investment in private companies to provide transportation to the lunar surface, including ispace, Astrobotic, Intuitive Machines, and Firefly.

Exploiting resources has to be a joke, right? Do they want to sell us the newly found moon water? The only point I get is the tourism aspect. Because, of course, I always encourage billionaires to pursue dangerous hobbies 😊

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago

Exploiting resources has to be a joke, right?

No, there is a resource on the moon that could be a game changer for humanity. Heluim-3.

What is He3?

He3 is produced in the sun and arrives at the moon via the solar wind, which constantly hits the moon due to no atmosphere or magnetic field to absorb or deflect it.

The earth has basically zero He3 as the solar wind is deflected by the earth's magnetic field.

Why could it be important?

He3 is a very good fuel for Fusion.

The 2009 movie, Moon, centres around a future He3 mining operation.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

The earth has basically zero He3 as the solar wind is deflected by the earth's magnetic field.

We actually have quite a bit of it here on Earth. Much of it comes from old sources, like our first lithium on Earth when the planet was still a ball of molten material. Many of the neutrons from space directly impacted our earilest lithium desposits that were exposed to the vaccum of space. This created a lot of Helium-3 via spallation. A lot of that newly created Helium was vented directly into space never to return, however some became trapped.

The problem of that is, much of that gas is trapped deep in pockets too close to the mantle for anything manmade to ever reach. So we must wait for cracks to form allowing the gas to rise up away from the incredibly hot mantle to somewhere machines can access.

Additionally, we have Uranium and Thorium in the core of the planet emitting Helium-3/4 as a decay product. For pretty much the same reason with the exception that the core is MUCH deeper than the mantle, we're unable to access that gas and must wait for it to slowly bubble up.

We do also have some that's been "frozen" in underwater soil as a result of underwater nuclear bomb testing. However that is mostly inaccessible to us due to the contamination of the soil of much deadlier material also "frozen" in place there. Which also means that we can produce Helium-3 ourselves, but it comes at a massive cost. So finding a natural deposit would be ideal.

He3 is a very good fuel for Fusion.

Uh, sort of. D + He-3 fusion is what's touted as ideal. The product of the fusion reaction is 50/50 of He + p + 18.3 MeV and He + 2p + 12.86 MeV. The thing is, the deutrium cannot be always assured to mix with the Helium-3 100% of the time. So you will have some D+D fusion which will result in neutrons.

The is also a He-3 + He-3 fusion which provides no path for neutrons. However, the activation tempature is much higher and you must keep the reaction at a hotter tempature (requires stronger magnets that must be massively cooled). If we were ever to go for pure He-3 fusion, it would be likely a 3rd or 4th gen reactor design. There's a ton of challenges to making it commerically viable.

[-] psyqology@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Changesite

Thaf is too far back. I promise you, this is what they want.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

From your link: Changesite

"The lunar crystal is made of material previously unknown to the scientific community and contains a key ingredient for the nuclear fusion process"

"One of the primary ingredients found in this crystal is helium-3, which scientists believe may provide a stable fuel source for nuclear fusion reactors."

[-] psyqology@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

All good. I had never heard the name before so reading it was "Ah, that's the Chinese name for it".

[-] Hedup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

How is He3 a good fusion fuel?

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are two possible uses of He3 in fusion power.

Deuterium + Helium-3 yields the highest energy of possible fuels.

Helium-3 + Helium-3 lower yield but produces no neutrons. This makes designing a fusion power plant much easier.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] psyqology@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

My bad. It seems like both are the reason because helium-3 is also found IN changesite.

[-] Hunter232@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

The moon is a great launching point. And the water (ice) could be converted to fuel for rockets.

Basically with a permanent moon base we could send much bigger payloads, could refuel rockets before sending them out further into the solar system, could set up observatories that wouldn't be affected by the atmosphere, could collect solar energy and send it back to earth via microwaves. Not to mention all the geological science, spelunking, and moon golf we could be doing.

There's all kinds of things we could do.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Imagine the far side of the moon dotted with radio telescopes that make Arecibo look like a digital satellite dish...

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

To further clarify, one of the big reasons we don't do much in space is because it's really expensive to get stuff up there, even with the reduced costs from reusable rockets. After a certain point it's cheaper to make a base on the moon, build stuff there and launch it to do whatever you wanted to do than it is to do it here and launch it into space. That it would also reduce the impact on the environment at some point is also a plus.

Of course, all of that requires the resources be available on the moon. We already know the moons composition is similar to earth's, but we weren't sure about water. Now that we know water is there, we have everything we need to have lunar industry.

[-] Logh@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I wonder how much stuff we need to deposit on the surface to start fucking with the orbit and create yet another global disaster.

[-] Bimfred@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Hate to disappoint, but it's far more than you could possibly imagine. You could dump the equivalent mass of the entire human civilization, every single person and everything we've ever made, on the Moon and it wouldn't have a noticeable effect.

[-] Logh@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Not disappointed at all. I was wondering how much and the answer was a whole lot, which is kind of what I was expecting.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] foo@withachanceof.com 23 points 1 year ago

Again why? Is this some repetition of the Cold War Soviet-US competition?

Yes, it's a prestige project. It's the same reason why some countries spend billions to host competitions like the Olympics/World Cup: it's an international dick measuring contest.

(For the record, scientific investment in space programs has incredible ROI so I whole heartedly support programs like this even if the motivation for doing so on the part of politicians is less than noble.)

[-] AWildMimicAppears@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Yea but so what? Hydrogen is literally the most common thing in the universe, no fucking way there is also some on the moon 🤯. Then what’s so spectacular about moon ice, water, or even oxygen? And why does it need people to explore it?

Hydrogen is common, readily available high concentration deposits of hydrogen/oxygen sources are not. The craters being in perpetual darkness does not help robotic survey and exploration since solar panels aren't available and it's probably very cold (although i don't know if RTGs wouldn't fix that)

Exploiting resources has to be a joke, right? Do they want to sell us the newly found moon water? The only point I get is the tourism aspect. Because, of course, I always encourage billionaires to pursue dangerous hobbies 😊

if you want to make space travel and exploration more common, a refueling/refining station or production capabilities on the moon would be awesome - most of the energy we need now for that is needed to escape earths gravity well. Being able to build a space vessel on the moon would be awesome! Also, being able to extract resources on the moon would remove the ecological impact of mining from earth. And like you i always encourage our elite to follow their dreams into whatever abyss they want 😁

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just to preemptively have presence and if possible dominance on a new territory before everybody has established themselves. Just in case a new discovery of the usefullness of the things found in the moon is discovered in the near future and also for claim in the present known use of the things available on our moon.

it's jst like countries holding on ot small uninhabitable islands in the ocean. a "just in case" type of thing.

Edit: I forgot to add. MOON LASERS

[-] Moghul@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Space is the final frontier. It's where we'll be doing the rest of our exploration of the universe. The reason you would do that is not so much to discover new life and new civilizations but to discover new phenomenons and technologies that can help us better understand the universe, help us live better/easier, help us experience cool new things, etc.

The news is full of it, excitement seems high, and I really don’t get it. I’m not against space-related research, but why suddenly the moon? And why send people there? Can someone fill me in on what’s to be gained or why one might be excited about it?

It's the closest celestial body, so it's great for practice. Next up, Mars. Both of these are solid, so we can land there and check them out. Get an idea for what works and what doesn't, how to build habitats in space, etc.

Yea but so what? Hydrogen is literally the most common thing in the universe, no fucking way there is also some on the moon 🤯. Then what’s so spectacular about moon ice, water, or even oxygen? And why does it need people to explore it?

Water is one of the main substances you need for life as we know it. Essentially all life on Earth needs water to some degree, so any time we find water somewhere we get excited because what if it's alien life? Wouldn't that be cool? Aside from that, oxygen, hydrogen, and water in space is good to have, because then you don't have to carry it from Earth. If we set up a base on Luna, maybe we can drink water that's already there, and use hydrogen and oxygen that's already there to power machinery. It's expensive as fuck to get anything into space, so if you don't have to carry something to your destination because there's already some there, that's just better.

Again why? Is this some repetition of the Cold War Soviet-US competition?

For governments, it's part dick measuring competition, part trying to get their names in the history books, part trying to not be left behind. For scientists and the rest of us, it's part livelihood, part curiosity. Space is hard to deal with, so we come up with all sorts of stuff to let us live up there. Here's a list of a bunch of stuff that stems from the space race: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/07/08/space-race-inventions-we-use-every-day-were-created-for-space-exploration/39580591/

Exploiting resources has to be a joke, right? Do they want to sell us the newly found moon water? The only point I get is the tourism aspect. Because, of course, I always encourage billionaires to pursue dangerous hobbies 😊

There's a bunch of shit in space that we have very little of, or is hard to reach, on Earth. Not necessarily water, I went over that earlier. But all kinds of other stuff, including He3 which is useful used in nuclear fusion.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Moon is very attractive as a staging area for missions further into the solar system. Since it has low gravity and no atmosphere, it's much easier to launch stuff from the moon. It would also be possible to build a space elevator on the moon even using current level of technology.

The moon is also a great test for building a space colony. It's a much more realistic prospect than trying to build one on Mars. At some point humanity will become a spacefaring species unless we make ourselves go extinct. Exploration of the Moon is the first step towards that.

It's also worth noting that such large scale projects necessarily result in a lot of technological development that has lots of practical applications here on Earth.

Finally, I personally think that it's good to have an ambitious vision that humanity can work towards. Space exploration is inspiring and it's a positive vision for our future. This is something that's sorely lacking in our world today.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

Part of the Moon being a staging area is that it may end up being feasible to source material from the Moon instead of Earth. This allows for shipping materials at a much lower energy cost since we don't need to lift off from Earth's gravity well.

And for the space elevator, the reason why a space elevator on the far side of the Moon is valuable is because making the elevator longer than necessary could make it a good launch point for other missions. This will act as a slingshot to others entities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the moon has no atmosphere, it gets rare elements that cost $$$$$$$$$$$ to make here on earth, which can be used for energy. As we learn more about fusion, we've determined some of the fuel we might eventually use can come from the moon, not to mention nearby asteroids and metals that can be used for cheap manufacturing. Space has a lot of cheap scrap metal. Like, economy crashing cheap, in some cases.

Like war, pushing into new environments requires and creates new branches or research and technology, such as better ways of recycling air, water (looking at you, Arizona, italy, india and any landlocked country), waste, etc. New medical breakthroughs such as 3D printing proteins for remote medicines and vaccines, new power sources such as micro reactors, new space infrastructure such as Skyhooks, and baby's first terraforming research, as we are currently destroying the only known habitable planet known across roughly 13 billion light-years :)

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago

Two items not mentioned:

  1. The cost of space launches is getting to the point where getting to the Moon is becoming economicly feasible to a larger group of nations and/or corporations. This means it is becoming a greater reality for human claims on the Moon to be created and maintained.

  2. There may be a decent cache of rare earth metals on the Moon. If there is, that could yield a lot of money for a space company to send these metals to Earth. Given the limited supply on Earth, it may be worth it to mine the materials in space.

[-] jaywalker@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

rare earth metals

Aka common moon rocks?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One word: Helium.

We have an ongoing shortage of Helium3 which is used in all sorts of science, medicine and tech. The moon has lots of it. We want it.

They also want the ice and water because it would so much easier to stage launches on the moon than on Earth. If there is ice or water up there, we won't have to send any from Earth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Where else are the billionaires going to flee to once the planet's proper fucked?

[-] nohamsandwich@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Humanity is benefited by space. Getting to space from Earth is very hard because of Earth's gravity well. The Moon sits at the rim of Earth's gravity well and getting to space from the Moon is comparatively much easier, saving about 97% of the energy that it would take to launch the same mass from Earth. Resources such as water can be mined on the Moon to be turned into rocket fuel (Liquid Hydrogen + Liquid Oxygen). The Moon is therefore an excellent staging ground for humanity to get a foothold in space, enabling bigger spacecraft, longer missions, and much much more activity in space. Humanity needs to expand beyond Earth for its own benefit. The Moon is the first stop to getting there.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They want rare Earth metals and minerals and such, duh.

[-] nocturne213@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If they are on the moon would that not make them rare moon metals?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

No, they're called rare-earth metals because they're rare on earth. On the moon they're just rocks.

[-] weew@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they aren't rare on earth. Most of them are quite common, it's just that the ancient Greeks didn't know how to extract/purify them so they called them rare. The name is 2500 years out of date, but it's stuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] psyqology@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

So... China found a mineral on the moon like 2 years ago that everyone seems top want actually. Called Changesite, but i don't know why or what it does. Just that it is some kind of phosphate.

[-] player1@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Hello sir or ma’am. I’m from the brightside corporation - can I interest you in owning a slice of paradise? Where you say? The moon!

[-] Feelfold@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Concerned about growing human and environmental rights, corporations pressure governments to create new unregulated zones to better exploit people and land.

[-] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I enjoyed the active interaction on this post!

[-] occhineri@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Our economic system is depending on everlasting growth. It is obvious, that it's natural boundaries have long been overcome. What remains is selling people and also nations wishes, desires and hopes. Elon Musk's, Jeff Bezos' and also China's Spacegames are really nothing but castles in the sky with a pinch of military sabre rattling.

[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for all the great answers and the super interesting discussion! I learned a lot and even get the excitement, although a lot of it seems extremely far away from today's possibilities. Mainly the whole mining of Helium3, transporting it back and then actually using it. So I wouldn't be surprised if an even more efficient energy technology was discovered and applied before the first mining activities on the moon begin.

Also, the moon as a possible source of disputes scares me way more than the possibility of using it as a permanent colony or launching point into the great nothingness excites me. And I don't mean that because WW3 seems kinda possible right now, but also because even friendly nations still have disputes over tiny islands. I just don't think we are ready for it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
124 points (91.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43728 readers
1119 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS