[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

I think !shortstories@literature.cafe would be a good place for it. The community sidebar says your own stories are welcome. You might want to add that you're specifically looking for feedback

72
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by BitSound@lemmy.world to c/python@programming.dev

Original comment:

I don’t know much about voting systems, but I know someone who does. Unfortunately he’s currently banned. Maybe we can wait until his 3-month ban expires and ask him for advice?

Previous discussion

15
Peter Watts, "The Things" (clarkesworldmagazine.com)
15

Finished reading the Remembrance of Earth's Past series (i.e. The Three-Body Problem and the other books) and have opinions. WARNING: SPOILERS

Overall I liked it a lot. I felt like the books could've been a lot tighter though, and Liu Cixin really needed an editor. Lots of cool ideas, but I did not care about the 3 old guys arguing with each other in the first part of the second book. It gave some background info, but that could've been collapsed into a few paragraphs. I also didn't need the whole backstory of some some ship's cook whose plot relevance was about 10 seconds long.

I didn't have my mind blown by the ideas in it. Not that I begrudge people that do, I'm just not lying awake worrying about the dark forest hypothesis. Maybe it's because there's not much we can do about it anyways 🤷. I did really like the recasting of string theory's 11 dimensions as not some beautiful reality of the universe, but as the result of brutal galactic warfare.

I thought the FTL communication was kind of weird for a series that mostly tried to stick to (or at least give lip service to) hard sci-fi. If you haven't seen it before, this is a good explainer of the problems with FTL communication: https://projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/fasterlight.php. In the end, I think it more wants to be cosmic horror than hard sci-fi, which is fine.

One minor nit I have is that at the very end they talk a big deal about making messages last for billions of years, and they arrive at carving messages into stone. Good idea, but even then the message got partially lost. Why not add redundancy and carve it multiple times? I also kind of expecting something "clever", like writing the message into the genes of the mobile trees or something.

48
submitted 2 months ago by BitSound@lemmy.world to c/bluey@lemmy.world

Sadly didn't notice it until after the event was over otherwise I would've helped draw it

https://canvas.fediverse.events/#x=899&y=69&zoom=12

1
submitted 2 months ago by BitSound@lemmy.world to c/metal@lemmy.world
210
Hobbes on Canvas (lemmy.world)

There's a nice Hobbes being drawn on Canvas. Someone from here drawing it? Is there a template?

1
[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

That's an interesting comment from a guy that used to work for Canonical, and then went anti-snap pretty hard, to the point that he made this:

https://github.com/popey/unsnap

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago

There's some even older UI bits buried around in there:

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

This is tilting at windmills. If someone has physical possession of a piece of hardware, you should assume that it's been compromised down to the silicon, no matter what clever tricks they've tried to stymie hackers with. Also, the analog hole will always exist. Just generate a deepfake and then take a picture of it.

1
macburgere (lemmy.world)
21
submitted 11 months ago by BitSound@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I have a self hosted HA deployment that hasn't been updated in a while. I haven't updated it partially because they made the boneheaded move of deprecating their YAML config in favor of GUI-only config, and partially because the developers are insufferable dickholes.

I should probably move off of the deployment that I've got right now at some point, but what are people currently using for home automation? Is anyone running a newer version of HA that thinks it's not actually that bad?

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Much of the concept of "intellectual property". Here's a good essay by Richard Stallman:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html

Copyright by and large needs to be abolished. Patents in software are nonsensical, and elsewhere they should be drastically scaled back. Trademark is alright, with a few adjustments needed.

But all of the above is hiding behind a concept of "property" that just does not apply to intangible things, and we need to stop using that term to describe them.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 138 points 1 year ago

You're going to get a lot of comments about Ubuntu and snaps. Definitely one of the reasons I switched away from it.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

Gary Larson has commented on how he accidentally writes some pretty indecipherable comics. His most famous one even has its own Wikipedia page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cow_tools

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

!datahoarder@lemmy.ml looks active and seems like a good place for it

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

"Ok class, for the rest of the semester, we're going to use the C89 standard".

I forgot the return 0; at the end of my main function and lost points on a test. Decided to be a point slut to ensure an A in the class and argued that it's allowed in the C99 standard. The professor sighed and gave me back my points, but next class specified the exact standard he was grading by.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago

This seems really short-sighted. Why would I go to How Stuff Works when I can just ask the LLM myself?

Maybe there's just no possible business model for them anymore with the advent of LLMs, but at least if they focused on the "actually written by humans!" angle there'd be some hook to draw people in.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Those are dumb fucking patents. I hope Google fights this to the end and gets them invalidated.

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

The scary temperatures you see in news headlines are basically unaffected by the fires. Wikipedia has a good overview:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surface_temperature

The overall issue with global warming is not that one place gets super hot once and sets a record. Otherwise I could make news headlines by setting my house on fire and getting "hottest temperature ever! (at my house)". Those local hotspots of fire will affect the average global temp only a tiny bit, because the earth is a big place and there's lots of places not currently on fire. The thing to worry about is the reverse actually: because the earth is warming, fires are increasing everywhere, and then everybody will be next to a fire on that blessed record-setting day.

view more: next ›

BitSound

joined 1 year ago