Who cares? They're just pedestrians, it's not like they're honest car-driving citizens

~ 'murica

Sounds like a "no true Scotsman" argument tbh

Gut solche Raketen abzuwehren ist kein hexenwerk, man muss eigentlich nur die zielerfassung stören.

Habe den Sesselgeneral gefunden

There are quite a few mature projects in 0.x that would cause a LOT of pain if they actually applied semver

Depending on how one defines the "initial development" phase, those projects are actually conforming to semver spec:

Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything MAY change at any time. The public API SHOULD NOT be considered stable.

Alles klar, dann führ deine Schlammschlacht mal weiter. Ich war wohl der irrtümlichen Annahme, man müsse sich nicht immer auf das Pöbelniveau der anderen Seite hinabbegeben...

P.S.: Die Definition von Sealioning solltest du vllt. nochmal nachschlagen.

There weren't even any insults there, unless you think being a Lemmygrad user is one. Come to think of it, you may be onto something...

On a serious note: They're also spreaing Russian propaganda about the war in Ukraine, which is enough to discredit them anyway. Did I say war? Of course I mean SpEcIaL MiLiTaRy fAiLuRe!

I don't doubt it, I just have a problem with the reasoning that something is "natural" and therefore good. It's a common misconception that charlatans use to prey on people.

Im Status Quo gibt es tatsächlich schon eine Menge false positives, weil viele (mich eingeschlossen) einfach jeglichen (voice-)chat abschalten, um sich nicht mit sowas herumschlagen zu müssen.

Stimme dir absolut zu bzgl. Chatkontrolle. M.E. ist es aber ein wichtiger Unterschied, was genau und wie blockiert wird. Was ich mit meinem Kommentar sagen wollte, ist: Es gibt legitime und gute Anwendungsfälle für automatisierte Blockierfunktionen, ebenso wie es natürlich auch das Gegenteil davon gibt.

There's always the option to get a headphone jack adapter for USB-C. I haven't used one personally yet, but I've heard it to be a viable alternative.

The EU has a PPP GDP of $24.05 trillion compared to the US' $25.4 trillion. That is a market of significant size and leaving it will affect Google's bottom line.

You can compare Alabama and France all you want, that is irrelevant. Or should I perhaps start comparing Mississippi and Luxembourg?

Lastly, I don't know if you've noticed but Google isn't the only search engine in existence. Bing, Qwant et al. will gladly fill the void that Google leaves behind.

Wasabi might also be worth mentioning, a while back I compared S3-compatible storage providers and found them to be cheaper for volumes >1TB. They now seem to be slightly more expensive (5.99$ vs. 5$), but they don't charge for download traffic.

I wouldn't call the discussions in this thread toxic, though. There are simply different viewpoints, some people are rather strict in their rejection of Meta's advances, and others (such as you) call for more open-mindedness.

There's simply no comparison to the name calling and other bs frequently found on Facebook, Reddit etc. Of course the Fediverse isn't immune to that, but I think we're doing rather well atm.