when both are available it's hard to decide.
It's easy to decide: AUR (only)
Personally, I use pacman for as much as I can, then dip into yay for anything else.
when both are available it's hard to decide.
It's easy to decide: AUR (only)
Personally, I use pacman for as much as I can, then dip into yay for anything else.
Another reason to leave Windows...
(I know, my comment doesn't address the core issue)
Yeah, an interesting piece.
As someone who's seen the internet arrive, watched the various battles (best seen on Internet Explorer at 640x320) and tried all the latest things (why use gopher when google can search immediately), then I do think it started out well
But, yep, I've also seen the effects when the bills needed paying and realising that just taking things that are "free" without giving anything back is unsustainable.
That's why I contribute when & where I can... Arch Wiki, Open Street Map, a few payments to developers and independant media sources, helping others...
But it takes some effort and I get it, not everyone has the same priorities. Yet.
I could not for the life of me make the ethernet transfer speeds be more than somewhere around 1-5 MiB/s
That's probably a physical cable issue.
Check the connectors and / or different cables.
It's esp. more important for 1Gbps connections as they're more sensitive than 100Mbps
Ok, fair point
Ahhh, well spotted
Just add a "Not To Be Used In California" note.
If - yep, a VERY big If - that happened it would at least trigger a larger discussion. At the moment, no-one in the general public knows about this erosion of privacy.
Define "Operating System"...
I guess my washing machine & car are also going to be "not for use in California."
Those Cisco switches & Broadcom DSLAMs would be tricky too ... I guess the internet's "not for use in California."
And the air-gapped power station control system? "not for use in California."
It is annoying that these laws come in (I'm also including magical thinking about encryprion backdoors for "the good guys") without any form of real-world, practical assessment. Complete waste of tax payers money and undue stress for everyone.
FFS.
I think others have generally caught this, but I wanted to simplify the point: the apps on your phone are not controlling your home, a computer is. If you don't use Google's, then you'll need to provide one.
So, Microsoft saved everyone from the bad Linux then?
/s
Er. Am I the only one to comment that this is a refreshing change to all the displays in shops, airports, etc that show the many ways that Windows errors and BSODs?
Linux on the desktop? Hell no, it's on 80' billboards.
(It's not Arch btw)
Well, the article does actually state that in the text...