[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

It is with the electoral college

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

people only started using the new pronunciation in the last 10-15.

As someone else pointed out already, this is untrue. While it may not have been popular in your circles, it definitely was in others. I've been saying it with a hard g as long as you have with a soft and I'm not the originator either.

English linguistics doesn't indicate anything at all.

They absolutely do. That's why you can sound out a word you've never seen before. You may not always be right when you do because they indicate, they don't define.

There are no rules about word construction or pronunciation.

There are, there are just exceptions. For example, an e at the end of the word is silent. I'm certain you can give me a word where it's not, but there are at least six in this paragraph alone where it is.

if you are understood then you have pronounced them correctly

In this logic if someone has been pronouncing a word all their life with a single pronunciation and travels to another location with a much different accent they can only now be pronouncing the word wrong.

If understanding is also the only metric then a hard g would still be preferable. Not only does a written g tend to make people lean to a hard g in my experience, but there's more words that could be mistaken for a soft g pronunciation.

You could argue that the original pronunciation is archaic,

Could I not argue that the original pronunciation has fallen out of favor?

the word itself is like 35 years old

Is there a time requirement for pronunciations to become archaic?

since there was only one acceptable pronunciation

Which isn't a time that existed, as we've established

who aren't likely to change.

Given your stance on language this is absolutely a you problem. If the rest of us collectively decided to understand it as only with a hard g, you would not be understood and therefore be pronouncing it wrong by your own logic.

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

The situation will almost always call for it.

And the rules, as Barbossa would tell you, are more like guidelines. Throw out the ones that hamper fun but take the time to understand which ones those are and why they do.

But no one here can tell you which those will be. They can be different at every table

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

You are technically correct

The best kind of correct

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Frodo ate a Nazgûl?

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I was sure it was quite a bit older than one year. I'd say I'm getting old but I'm way younger than politicians

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

My quote, not theirs. Also Russia is a bully. Similar to the kind that takes lunch money, but on a much larger scale

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Running both Windows and Linux

Yeah but what if I'm not dual booting?

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Or, maybe, the owners of the restaurant make slightly less profit and pay their employees a living wage.

And maybe landlord start handing over deeds to the people paying their mortgages. But we're operating in reality and need to consider things that might happen.

If companies eat the cost of pay increases how will the executives afford that new yacht they've been eyeing?

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I can actually explain that.

Gmail will ignore periods and things after a plus sign.

So if we assume my name in so if you have Man.And.Wife@gmail it's the same as ManAndWife@gmail as well as M.a.n.A.n.d.W.i.f.e@gmail or anything in between.

You could also use ManAndWife+roebuck@gmail if you wanted to filter out the emails you get from a defunct retailer.

It's all very useful for categorizing emails and tracking down who is selling your email address to spam lists

[-] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Computing resources got cheaper so development didn't need to be as careful.

If one month you have $100 for food, but the next month you'll have $2000 are you still going to eat like you've got $100? Of course not!

But another part of the problem is that when development was slim you also weren't running very many things at once. I can remember writing different autoexec.bat and config.sys files to boot straight into whatever game I was going to play. Most to all of the resources were available.

Now we're constantly running a handful of things. The OS itself is huge, plus a browser that you haven't closed with a handful of tabs, plus the app for the store you bought the game from, and whatever else is in the background, and so on. So you feel the drag more because everything wants as many resources as it can grab before something else does.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Doug

joined 1 year ago