Some popular neoclassical economic models rely on the "No-Ponzi-Scheme" condition being true. Essentially meaning that Capital can't become negative because there are no ponzi schemes which affect the economy.
This seems like that assumption is just one of the wrong ones.
Because reddit makes you think it's needed. It's cheeky you have to skip the email entry or leave it empty with nothing telling you that it's optional.
"Czesc, I am Mister Anonymous. I would like to buy this Book. Please send it to Jan Pawel at this address, dziekuje."
I am not sure what he's hinting at. Just using Tor doesn't bear any legal risks. Hosting an exit node is different, as depending on the country you might get into serious trouble if certain traffic goes through it.
To be fair the vast majority of scientists will take other factors into account. If you thought of "this could also be because of that" then you can be sure that the scientists and the ones reviewing the publication also thought about it and addressed it. There are exceptions, sure, but don't just assume everyone is bad at their job.
Shit I didn't know oauth means you got to tell the truth on the internet.
They will actively contribute while growing their userbase. When they hit critical mass they will cutoff the fediverse and take their users and their content with them. It happened before.
Decentralize! FEDERATE EVERYTHING!
Damn, what am I going to do with my life when I stop wasting time on youtube?
I had a similar thought. How fair is nebula to their creators? I heard it was somehow creator owned, but other than that I have no idea how it works.
As long as that other app also uses activitypub which might not be the case
Fuer Leute die Schwierigkeiten haben sich hier zu identifizieren. Hier kann man sehen ob man noch "Mittelschicht" oder schon verblendeter Darmausgang ist. (Mittelschicht geht bis 200% des Medianeinkommens) https://www.iwkoeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/HTML/2022/Einkommensrechner/index.html