Why the fuck do the europeans think that they should be the ones to set the conditions for the ceasefire?

I heard that about 1000 people fainted in that concert because they didn't allow people to bring water bottles so they would buy overpriced water bottles in the venue (which is against the Consumer Defence Code in Brazil).

edit: and people did not buy the water bottles because nobody wants to pay, like, more than R$10,00 in a water bottle that costs a few cents if you just bring tap water from home (incredibly, in most of the state of São Paulo, where the show happened, tap water is completely safe as long as it is coming directly from the grid, and not from your home reservoir)

edit: also, in Santos (a coastal city near São Paulo), some street thermometers measured 50°C on saturday, as shown in the local news channel "A Tribuna" (The Tribune). The increase in temperature is probably due to the boiling hot asphalt of the streets.

They literally have cut a part of the interview with one of the protesters, exactly when she said that "parents should choose what to teach their children, even if it is...", now, what was she going to say that they do not want us to hear?

edit: they even played the same clip twice just to show us that they don't care that we know that they removed a part of the clip.

edit2: also, one of the interviewed people said called the counterprotestors "sodomites".

edit3: one guy even said that "this is a christian nation, that is why you have freedom of speech" and said that "this is caused by sin".

edit4: bruh, one guy complained that when he was in school students were expelled for "not complying with a trans student's pronouns". I mean, if you do racist stuff you get expelled, so why shouldn't you be expelled for being transphobic? It is easy to use the right pronouns.

???

That's TikTok, from a private corporation. They do not represent the CPC or the Chinese Government.

Where did you get that information? I just searched it online and the first results say about 33% efficiency for coal plants and between 25% and 30% for gasoline engines.

I'll edit my coment in a few minutes with the links to my sources.

edit: those efficiencies are energy efficiencies, completely unrelated to emmissions. I did not find any sources for emmissions efficiencies, but I'd guess knowing the energy efficiencies that coal is worse for the environment than gasoline.

edit 2: Coal power plant efficiency: https://www.pcienergysolutions.com/2023/04/17/power-plant-efficiency-coal-natural-gas-nuclear-and-more/

gasoline ICE efficiency:

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv.shtml

here it says that the engine losses go from 64% minimum on roads to 75% maximum on cities.

I mean, I do not know if EVs are as bad to the environment as regular gasoline-powered vehicles, but I do know that they won't fix the problem of the environmental devastation caused by car culture since they still run on energy made from gas and coal plants and they are still as inefficient in transporting people as regular vehicles.

I know that it will be very difficult to substitute cars for public transit. Actually, public transit will never fully substitute cars since there will always be places that are too far away for trains, trolleys, and other forms of public transit to reach. Also, ambulances, police cars, and firefighter trucks should never be substituted by public transit, since they need speed and versatility more than anything. But for most people, public transit could be insanely attractive if enough investment was put into it. Most people go through the same few paths every day, and even then, they almost always go at the same time every day.

I suggest that cities go substituting cars for public transit in small batches by building infrastructure and changing urban development laws in key places and then expanding to the rest of the city.

edit: Oh, and by the way, here in Brazil EVs are literally just dumb. Although Brazil is mostly run by clean hydrelectric energy, which would be very nice for EV development, we also have lots of sugarcane farms producing sugar and ethanol. Ethanol is widely used here as a biofuel, and there is a dynamic between sugar prices and ethanol prices, where low sugar prices make ethanol a more lucrative business, thus making the agribusiness produce more ethanol, and vice-versa. So, if we just put lots of taxes on sugar and make it less profitable, or we subsidize ethanol, we could make people use ethanol instead of gasoline, and then we would have a near carbon neutral fleet of cars without having to transition to electric.

(public transit is still better, though)

"A planet that runs on land, you can morph it, alter it, but you won't be able to destroy it."

-you but under feudalism.

Didn't you just describe cops?

https://www.ifixit.com/News/74736/warranty-void-stickers-are-illegal-in-the-us-what-about-elsewhere

Here you go, fellow internet user.

edit: the problem with this is that companies won't listen to the law because they know that you probably won't sue them, and even if you do sue them they don't care because they will receive a slap in the wrist.

edit2: Also, fuck, it is only illegal in the USA.

this fine print is illegal in lots of countries (including the USA) by the way.