[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

No worries, he can optimize it later.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Remember that time when he uninstalled his desktop environment? :D

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think they want to compete with GNU/Linux and attract its users. They made WSL for probably the same reason. They even have a terminal now that almost doesn't suck.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

It's super weird to me that pirates aren't advocating for the Free Software movement. Being able to control their own devices should be like one of their main goals.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 67 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, that would be too soon. It took them over 20 years to make a package manager, 15 years to add tabs to Windows Explorer. Maybe in 10-20 years they will do it.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

GNOME also has an app that lets you do encrypted incremental backups very easily.

But Steve didn't contact Linus to give him time to prepare an explanation in which he would blame everyone else and say how sad he is! It's just a poor $100M company, they are just humans and they make mistakes. :D

They have been misleading millions of people for years and getting away with it. I hope this company is done. There have to be consequences for this kind of behavior.

What Gamers Nexus did should be the standard. Serious reviewers should check on each others work and point out errors on regular basis. It's the only way to get rid of corrupt channels like Linus Tech Tips and I suspect they were just one of many.

The average person doesn't understand modern technology even on a basic level. Most people don't know what Free Software is or what end-to-end encryption is and you can't have privacy without those two. And those things have existed for decades. What about more complicated topics such as cryptocurrencies or AI? It's easy to see that most people don't understand them either.

So when it comes to some basic aspects of modern technology, most people are decades behind. Sometimes I even meet software developers who don't fully understanding those topics.

-1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I found two apps that seem to be violating the AGPL license. They both use the AGPL-licensed lemmy-js-client library, which means the apps themselves should also use the same license (which is the whole purpose of Copyleft). But they aren't. I don't know if Lemmy developers and contributors are aware of this.

The apps:

https://github.com/ando818/lemmy-ui-svelte - Apache license

https://github.com/aeharding/wefwef - MIT license

What should we do about this as a community? I informed one of the app's developers about this and it doesn't seem like they care. I wonder if some of the proprietary apps that are being developed right now also rely on this library.

Update: wefwef now includes the AGPL license in the repo. Thank you to the Lemmy user who reported it to the author and to the author for quickly resolving the issue :)

view more: next ›

Freesoftwareenjoyer

joined 1 year ago