If either one says anyways here's wonderwall and launches into the song I'll be ready to shoot them into the sun.

Let's not call it psy op then. We need a new term. BS op maybe?

I don't mind your fiddling with that razor at all. I see what you mean.

So you're trying to apply logic to an animated kids show. My advice is: stop. It doesn't matter. Cookie monster never eats a cookie either.

I like to imagine that all creators of kids shows were high as a kite when they came up with the premise. [Takes a massive hit] "Duuuude, they're like a team of first responder dogs but they can fly helicopters and one is a cop. They're like the Village People but dogs." [Takes another hit] "And they can talk!" And thus Paw Patrol was born.

[Lights up spliff] "Oy, mate. 'ere's the thing. She's a cheeky one, this Peppa. And she's a pig. 'Er 'ead's always sideways. She's always mucking about." [Inhales deeply] "And all the other muppets are animals too. But get this: there are other animals." [Exhales] "But they can't talk."

I agree that women are still being objectified and that's bad. I don't agree with workers being dehumanized by being referred to as such. "Workers of the world, unite!" was a big rallying cry. For some people, it's an identity-establishing part of life that they're using manual labor and not fart into a desk chair all day. They take pride in being working class.

If by referring to a group of working folks is dehumanizing then we cannot talk about people like housekeepers, street sweepers, nurses, or engineers either. They're people too. And I don't see "people with job X" catching on in the language either.

If you have a garage, at home. You might want you drop more details to get better answers. E.g. location.

You ask a lot of legitimate questions there, causes that you and I could come to an agreement over. I would erase the starting point though. Pride movements and workers movements might both look like similar demonstrations. They are borne out of very different motivations. People might look down on manual laborers but you wouldn't have to fear for your safety in certain parts of your city for being one. LGBTQ+ folks can't say the same. Pride movements bring awareness that we have discriminated or are still discriminating against whole swaths of the population - mostly for silly reasons. That's different from a disagreement about how exploitative capitalism should be permitted to be.

Another negative connotation is that this "why are there LGBTQ+ pride parades but not ...?" is the leading question of people who think straight people need to have a pride parade as well. Like you couldn't live a heteronormative life every day without fear of retribution. And I'm hoping that you don't think along those lines and therefore would not want to be this close to that argumentative train of thought.

We should all be using the name less. And I don't mean Jesus, I mean the other one. Because as far as I know Christ wasn't a raging, unapologetic pedophile.

I think there may be a paradox hiding in your question. You cannot believe in free will. You have it or you don't - I would postulate you need a neutral third-party observer to tell you. For us humans, a Martian might do. Believing is an act of faith. Faith tends to bend will to its dogmas. I would go so far as to say belief is the natural enemy of a free will.

We are distracted animals. All things being equal, the Martian observer will after years of careful study come to the conclusion that humans have free will. But it's constantly battered by short attention spans, a tendency to go with the herd, presupposituons in our heads that we don't often or never question, etc. We are a smartphone full of bloatware running on too little RAM. It takes skill to operate. Some are more skillful than others.

You could of course counter that by saying that's what you believe. It's paradoxes all the way down.

I think these two are almost if not entirely exclusionary. It cannot be Federation space if the inhabitants are pre-warp.

There are prime directive eff-ups. Like the flower bed trespasser assassins of S1 TNG. The Fed is in contact with the Edo although they shouldn't be but somehow s happened. We don't really know where they're located in reference to everything else in the Fed or the universe. But even if everything around them was warp hopping mad, the system of the Edo or at least their planet Rubicun III should be an exclave. In the scenario where the Fed would have to defend them from a hypothetical anti-prime-direxxer it could be a protectorate but not Fed territory.

I can think of two other instances with the PD that come close to this scenario but are no cigar. Data's long-fingered pen pal Salenka or something like that and Worf's adopted brother trying to save his knocked up pre-warp Penny Johnson. In both cases I don't think we know if the territory was Fed, Fed adjacent, or something else. And it's a moot point anyway because they were defending against natural disasters, not other species.

Why don't you ask your AI about how to achieve objectivity in your fake writing?

My review came with an asterisk. I mainly wanted to point out how to get it free so you can make up your own mind.