First experiment: pressing women into being scientists.
Success.
Second experiment: pressing scientists into women.
Failure. Called eugenicist, chased by pitchforks.
Curious. Same ingredients, different reaction. Something's missing... maybe it's pantsuits.
Why even bother with shouting if you have CHIM, just open the command line and put in tcl and tgm and no-clip out of there.
My idiot butt got a custom pre-built just a couple weeks ago and the cooler pump has one of those screens as well. It is not working and I suspect a plug is set wrongly, but the pump works.
Fixing it would mean ripping apart the pristine cable management and I do not care about lighting as much.
Otherwise I am fully satisfied, but it niggles me a little bit to have paid 20-30 bucks more for a cooler feature that does not work.
Maybe one day when I need to rip up the cable management anyway, I will fix it.
Thanks for the reply. I do appreciate your candor.
I wish you would have actually said anything about the game. I know that you enjoyed it. 45$ worth, at least.
You are blown away and find it breathtaking, but I am not really sure why that is.
Asking people what they like about a piece of media is not "letting internet strangers form your opinion".
I was asking because I am wondering where the game's strengths lie and what it does exceptionally well. Because then I could compare that to what I value most in a space game. And could decide if I give the free fly a try or spend my time on any of the other infinity+1 amounts of things to indulge in. (Which is right now emulating Bloodborne and playing Clair Obscure)
Elite Dangerous, X4, EVE or any other high-depth simulators never totally clicked with me. But I have spent considerable hours in Star Sector or the Starpoint Gemini games. Games that make me feel like I am a space cowboy without throwing me infinite possibilities with no reason to pursue any of them. Which is often the feeling No Man's Sky is giving me.
If I had to sum it up, I'd say I am more interested in Space RPGs than Space Simulators.
Maybe you could have shared what is actually sensational about the game. Which would probably have done more to counter any unfair criticism towards it, than just expounding on how unfounded preconceived opinions about it are. After all you love the game. So let some of that love shine through and carry the day.
I should have chucked the lines about budget and time, because they raised your hackles so much. You are probably used to the game being attacked on that avenue.
Maybe it is top of the pack in the genre; but by how much?
For how absolutely out of any reasonable dimension their budget and development timeframe is, what have they to show for it, that you cannot get from X4 or Elite: Dangerous or any Starship Traders or any similar game? I cannot imagine it doing every single appeal of those games better.
Honest question, as I do not like the super deeply simulated games anyway. I like my space sims at least 30% arcade-y and easy to pick up.
Asparagus is always in season.