[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago

Reminded me of this far side

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago

“I have things to do” lol

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago

You wouldn’t download a job

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago

I think in many cases the people who explain things are doing a huge service. They’re silently appreciated by many. The true GOATs of the internet.

I’ve read so many great explanations on Reddit for things in math, science, literature, etc and I feel very grateful to the people who explained them.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Ether you love it or hate it

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

Just my cope after an absurdly noisy morning :) happy weekend, everyone.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

X gon give it to ya

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago

That’s an interesting point.

Upon further reflection, I discovered I don't fully understand the nuances. So I tried to think it through.

I think it goes as follows:

  • Nihilism says there is no meaning so any pursuit whatsoever is futile. (Not goal based.)
  • Existentialism says there is no universal meaning but it is the individual who creates meaning. So we project our meaning into the world and live in it and therefore live in a meaningful world. We should search for our personal meaning. (Goal based.)
  • Absurdism says there is no universal meaning and if there is, we'll never understand it. This doesn't mean we shouldn't enjoy transient pseudo-meanings, though. In fact, we SHOULD enjoy them. But we should be aware that they're not eternal and not objective. (Not goal based.)

So, on second thought, I think the meme does a great a job at capturing absurdism. Still, the difference between existentialism and absurdism is subtle.

What do you all think? Is that kinda the idea?

I wonder if Existentialists or Absurdists consider our biological reality and needs when developing the ideas. For instance, we need food, shelter, social acceptance, and so forth. What does this say about "meaning" and pursuits like fashion and style (as it relates to social acceptance?). How does Maslow's hierarchy of needs fit in with these philosophies?

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 months ago

The absurdism depicted isn’t pure absurdism because there’s the presence of style, which is a system of meaning and value. So, as depicted, that’s more existentialism or a healthy and cool blend of absurdism with existentialism.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

This whole thing reeks of “I came here, acted perfectly reasonably and logically, and everyone else, astoundingly, was illogical and mean to me. I’m so smugly innocent. I’m the victim. This makes no sense!”

Not one bit of self-reflection.

Is there an archetype or myth about this behavior? There must be. Some type of ironic “innocent” contrarian? The little brother who provokes then runs to mommy to tattle?

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 38 points 6 months ago

I’m new here but I’m here precisely because of the enshittification of Reddit.

Honestly though, now that I think about it, a huge chunk of my digital experience has been enshittified. Technology and software that used to wow me still wows me at the surface but frustrates me at my core. Some UI elements and design seem outright hostile.

Maybe I’m just misremembering the past or was more patient back then. Reddit certainly has enshittified though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Hammocks4All

joined 6 months ago