That is probably the article's typo. At least it is not what was read into record.
Thank you for using "number of" instead of incorrectly using amount as is the current trend.
Hemlock
joined 1 year ago
That is probably the article's typo. At least it is not what was read into record.
Thank you for using "number of" instead of incorrectly using amount as is the current trend.
Not for long if you keep looking at the sun