[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Well, the title of the video is "Weird Spell Rulings" after all...

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In regards to the memory training: have you double-checked how much Ram your CPU actually supports, at what frequencies? For example even the 7950X3D supports only DDR5-3600 when you put more than 2 bars of ram in, leading to issues with memory training taking long/not posting/instability if you enable any form of overclocking in that scenario. I had that problem before and switching from 4 bars to two fixed everything. Just in case this might be your issue as well.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How does this follow in any way? You know that the distinction of "supplement" and "regular part of the diet" is completely arbitrary, right? What's the difference between regular supplementation and the requirement of "having to hydrate" or "eat your greens for your vitamins" to be healthy? It's even less logical/relevant considering many replacement products add B12 etc on their own by now.

Also factory farmed animals are getting B12 fed as a supplement, which makes this argument even weirder. "Pills bad/not part of the diet", but feeding the same pills to pigs and then eating their meat to get the same nutrients is suddenly "ok and natural/good diet"? Doesn't make sense to me.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, since the claim "veganism does cause intellectual deficiencies" is still wrong, because veganism doesn't cause this, a lack of supplementation does. And most vegans supplement adequately. So saying that veganism "per default" causes this would be dishonest, because it implies that not properly supplementing is the default/intrinsic to veganism, which is not the case.

It's like saying "drinking alcohol kills you" just because you have to be mindful of limiting your consumption and it can kill you if you don't. An extreme statement that contains a kernel of truth, but is simply not correct.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Your response isn't any better, to be honest. Yes, there is a certain risk of a negative impact on cognitive performance related to a large and long-time B12 or iron deficiency. But there is a large difference between "you have to take supplements to be healthy" and a blanket claim of "veganism does cause intellectual deficiencies", especially considering most vegans supplement.

Side note: the B12 in factory farmed meat is also supplemented to those animals, otherwise their meat wouldn't contain it, being produced under those conditions. One can only hope all farmers actually do this

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Langzeit-lurker hier. ich_iel ertränkt eh schon meine Timeline durch die Masse an posts relativ zu den anderen communities. Ich fand das bisher eher mäßig, aber mir dachte, dass man das ja "aushalten müsse" - Wachstum ist ja nicht schlecht für ne junge community.

Mir gingen die "signierten" Memes (mit Nudeln etc) schon etwas auf den Zeiger, weil das irgendwie so rüberkommt, als ob man sich unbedingt vom Rest der Community abheben will. Aber ok, kann man auch noch ignorieren.

Aber auf Meta-Kram, wo sich die Leute, die sich da selber ins Rampenlicht stellen dann auch noch "aus Spaß" gegenseitig als sexistisch bezeichnen, hab ich null bock. Erst selbst ungefragt zur celebrity ernennen und dann noch kontextfrei drama posten. ich_iel ist für Bildchen, die relateable sind. Wo ist das bitte relateable?

Ist auch nicht böse gemeint, ich glaub nur, das jetzt mal der Zeitpunkt wäre zu reflektieren, ob das, was gerade passiert überhaupt noch was mit ich_iel zu tun hat.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Why be concerned about your cats behaving "like a proper cat" as long as they are healthy and happy?

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

I live in a country where these measurements aren't used, so without any background knowledge I interpreted the comma as "and" at first. Looking at the picture, I'm pretty sure it's meant to be "or" instead, in which case they should have used a slash instead of a comma imo.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Chance verpasst, für diesen Post einen Account mit dem Namen "Instantkartoffeln" anzulegen.

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Ach und ich dachte, dass sei eine Anspielung auf den "Gen Z haircut" (Seiten kurz, oben lockig)

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago

uBlock Origin, to be precise!

[-] Incogni@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, the GM balances - they decide what type and how hard the encounters will be. But after that decision is made, it's the job of the system to provide the GM with tools to build that encounter and help me balance things: How much skeletons provide the difficulty I want? Is a lich too much? Red dragon or white dragon?

In 5e, you don't have the proper tools imo - the challenge rating is next to useless. In PF2, you have something akin to point buy for encounters - and if it says the encounter will be "moderate threat" - then you can trust that in 99% of the cases.

But at the end of the day, as a GM, if I want to provide my players with a hard, but fair fight, I don't want to have to guess what will work and what won't. Yes, with a lot of experience I will have an idea of that, but why would I pay for a system that just offloads the hard part of their game design to me? Good encounter-building tools don't get in the way of your creativity.

view more: next ›

Incogni

joined 1 year ago