Your article agrees with me. But it's clear I'm not going to be able to explain it to you.
Are all those involved in gang wars guilty? Probably not but it's still wise of the police not to get involved.
And similarly, yes the axe murderer who just murdered the other guys family and is asking for help. I'm probably gonna ignore him.
It's good that you point that out. Because it shows US really can't sanction China and only entities within it like it does to its own allies as opposed to straight country sanctions like Iran and North Korea.
https://www.tradecompliance.pitt.edu/embargoed-and-sanctioned-countries
Here's a list.
In fairness though, that list also shows the US can't sanction Russia either. So not sure how much of a flex not being able to sanction China is.
Copying software copies, therefore evil. Did I dumb it down for you?
And the TPP has stated they want to find a middle ground with China and got about 20% of the votes. Tallying up the votes that's 40% for independence and 60% for status quo or working with China. So a minority against working with China wins the presidential elections.
But their congress equivalent is now 60% of the parties that favor working with China.
This is western media bias. They're not reporting that in reality the majority of Taiwanese wants peace and status quo, not independence. So of course China will do nothing since they see this vote in their favor as the Yuan determines if there's a vote for independence, not the president. Western media however will 100% be beating the drums of war. Just watch
You are? Oh I'm sorry then. I didn't know you were so sensitive.
Says the person who makes a statement with no question. Right, I'm the one not arguing in good faith.
No you posted proof there's no evidence and then stated that it must be happening anyway because you don't believe the Muslims who said it isn't happening and downvote it. In fact, besides that statement, what is your question? You are not arguing in good faith.
I'm not moving goal posts, you are. I'm saying there's no evidence. You've confirmed there's no evidence. And then attacked the people who are Muslim and literally visited and confirmed there's no evidence. Because you didn't like the way they said it.
You know it's funny. People keep bringing that up even though China fully admits it was a mistake and vowed to never do it again. The censorship people talk about is that China won't disclose how many people died, not that they don't admit it happened.
And then HK happened. And there are no examples of the police killing anyone. Only one rumor of a girl who committed suicide off a building people tried to attribute to the HK police. Even when they stole a police officer's gun, or lit a janitor on fire, the HK police didn't kill anyone.
But the BLM riots...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiU8sL7Yq9Q
But yeah, China bad.
No it's not. I said 70 years since they attacked. What you're talking about is China's slow retreat out of Vietnam. That would be like arguing that USA invaded Afghanistan last year.
What the ever loving fuck are you even saying here?
Well unfortunately there are no international courts of law that USA would submit to. The only one, the ICC, they have literally threatened to invade if they did any kind of investigation into the GENOCIDAL CRIMES of the USA. So your argument that a court should prove it is moot since USA would nuke the court. Which is why I also find it hilarious that USA talks about rule of law when they actively threaten to wipe Brussels off the face of the earth.
*Edit: Oh man even Harvard is mocking them for that.
https://scholar.harvard.edu/ksikkink/blog/%E2%80%9Cinvade-hague%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Csupport-icc%E2%80%9D-america%E2%80%99s-shifting-stance-international-criminal-court
Also, I'm not talking about USA as in it's people, I'm talking about the US government. Sorry I did not make that clear. After all, it's not Joe Schmo talking about RT spreading propaganda.