[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I am about to share way way too much. So I figure I must be fairly attractive for a male, though I don't consider myself all that attractive. I have been hit on by both women and gay men. Most men on this planet have not, from either.

Here's the thing that women don't get. Even for someone like me it's few and far between. Like once a decade rare. And the few times it has happened, it did feel pretty good.

Imagine pining for that. I'm in a happy marriage, but I could imagine how lonely it would be to never have it happen ever.

So the saddest thing about her response that a straight man is jealous of the attention a 23 year old woman gets truly shows her ignorance. Because, many men would want that. Even if it's just to get a compliment once.

It's a sad world we live in.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

If that happens good? Why do we think having countries and borders that creates strife a good thing? If we eliminate all borders and are just humanity I see that as an absolute win.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

Just to be clear then, you're opposed to this bill passing?

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

That's an excellent question because people completely misunderstand freedom of speech. The law is freedom of speech from government persecution. Which is literally what banning Tik Tok is. It's the government persecuting a company for being Chinese.

What the law does not protect is private persecution. If you come to my house and announce you're a pedo, I can kick you out of my house for that. Just like tik tok can ban you.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Gotcha! Yes it is whataboutism. Just like what you're doing with China and their calls for peace in Gaza. Everything you said about China is arguing in bad faith and pushing US whataboutisms.

*Edit I love it I knew you were going to do this. Look at my comments above I'll quote myself

*Edit: I’m really hoping you’ll resort to whataboutism. Since your entire argument is a whataboutism. You’re saying you won’t believe genocide victims because what about China doing stuff that has nothing to do with Gaza.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Lol the leader of the election polls to be the next president is literally saying he'll invade Mexico. Sure Mexico has no worries. It's just the likely leader of USA saying it.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

Well Orban seems 100% on Putin's side regardless. I guess I don't know enough about Germany to know if that's something their far right wants, but wouldn't surprise me. And I suppose that all makes more sense since the far right in USA is clearly on his side already.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

No and that's what annoys me about how people talk about Taiwan with no understanding of what's actually going on. Status quo is Taiwan and China are one, but Taiwan runs itself independently, just as Taiwan wants.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

40% is not a majority.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

While correct, what the Junta is asking for makes perfect sense. China will never pressure anyone to do anything, but they would totally be willing to have both sides to cease fire and have peace talks and act as mediators. So asking China to ask the brotherhood isn't a bad idea.

However, considering the battlefield advantage that the brotherhood currently has, I question if they'll agree.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I like people to be interested and want the info. I don't know if you've noticed from my conversation here, the majority of people just want to argue with me and not actually learn something.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Ah classic, your all for rule of law until there's an actor you don't like following rule of law. Suddenly the law should change just for them. Hypocrite.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Joncash2

joined 1 year ago