[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do I need to say more?

Yes. Did the notices cost you anything, or did you ignore them without consequences?

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A while ago when I last used it one of the two services worked while the other didn't. Have you tried both?

Or are you using a webbrowser with no WebAssembly support or WebAssembly disabled?

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure what you're asking, but it seems you're not aware of the huge AI model field where various AI models are already being publicly shared and adjusted? It doesn't need piracy to see or have alternatives.

The key to hosted services like ChatGPT is that they offer an API, a service, they never distribute the AI software/model.

Other kinds of AI gets distributed and will be pirated like any software.

Considering piracy "around" them, there's an intransparent issue of models being trained on pirated content. But I assume that's not what you were asking.

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

OP could have included a summary, description, or quote of what they're referring to and criticizing. They did not.

If you don't own a Roku device, there's no reason to read all that. I certainly don't want to read the full privacy policy either and then guess what OP opened a discussion about or other commenters talk about.

Also, this community is called piracy, not privacy.

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Whenever I follow a link to a subdomain, I like to open the main website.

This one is a highlight https://tsps-express.xyz/

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't think that qualifies as "protection" of copyrighted content before law?

Some YouTube videos are protected like that, others not. The lawsuit is about those being circumvented. It is NOT about SSL or circumventing SSL.

An equivalent would be a copyright protection on images. Not SSL.

Forgive me if I am lacking the correct term for it.

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Whoa, I'm getting dizzy while scrolling. That background…

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Seems strange that the dev seems to be keeping quiet on this, no?

Which one? The repo owner certainly doesn't seem very active in general.

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

I imagine it is free because FreeTube collect data on you.

It doesn't have to sell user data if it doesn't have to make money if it is run by volunteers.

You can disable watch history in your Google/YouTube account as well. It's not like you're forced to have it on native YouTube either.

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I cannot subscribe

details needed

[-] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A coalition of the Green party and two others currently governs the country. The two bigger of those, Green party being one of them, lost a lot of votes, the small one (that's arguably the biggest issue for governing and publicity) didn't.

The green party had a huge success and increase in voters three years ago. But the way it went, the public communication and issues between the three parties, the inflation, and other energy cost increases presumably lead to voters now choosing to vote against them.

The central-right that governed for many years before received most votes. The far right, under institutional observation because of its danger to the constition/opposition to the constitution, had a big increase in voters too. Especially in the eastern states (previously eastern Germany) - traditionally more right-leaning.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Kissaki

joined 2 years ago