It’s an operating system that demands more of you than does the commercial offerings from Microsoft and Apple.
Does it?
It's different, but I imagine they're not fundamentally different if you exclude established knowledge/already being used to something.
Normal office use for non-techy people is launching apps, editing documents, and surfing the web. That doesn't work much differently, not fundamentally different, and not fundamentally more difficult.
At least that's a testament to neutrality - in a shitty way.
I asked 6 questions on StackOverflow. 3 in 2010 and 3 in 2011.
For context; I gave 183 answers.
I can agree with most questions having already been asked.
Moreso, most questions on StackOverflow can be answered with some context knowledge or some reading of official docs or references, or trying out. I've not felt the need to ask anything.
But how do you identify a leopard when you don't know about animals and it's wearing a shiny mask?
a sus linux? count me in!
When something hits you in the face you turn blue. This essentially hits you in the face, and matches that color.
Is it gatekeeping if they voice their disapproval? Is any form of disapproval gatekeeping? Where is the line?
They didn't ask them to stop posting or participating. Wouldn't that be the line where it crosses to gatekeeping?
They asked them not to attach the CC notice. It didn't address their content.
To make it more accessible
Yes, you should, as you already do.
Is your question whether you should worry? Whether you should link the source when you're illegally ignoring license terms? Or when you're following license terms?
It's not like they can drop jpg, or work on only one thing.
FF124, Windows; What I see is grey and a loading icon.
Have you opened the Browser Console?
downloadable font: Glyph bbox was incorrect
While one would not expect that to cause such issues, depending on if you're using a SPA or what kind of bootstrapping you use, or a Firefox consequential issue, it may. What happens if you skip web fonts?
I can open the browser console, and I can context menu inspect elements, and it selects them in the inspector. So it seems like the DOM is being rendered and laid out, to an interactable level.
When I open CTRL+SHIFT+M it looks very funky and broken. No border, nothing rendered; only the resize handle, which remains usable. Using different Window to compare, there should be a border and border shadow. This makes me come back to the font issue, and makes me wonder if trying to render a faulty font brings Firefox into a broken render state.
Does it need more than the borrow checker if it's a game changer?