Are you still actively working on/developing on the project?
Skipping new developments can be fine. Moving slow or not at all can mean stability and predictability.
The biggest issue is missed security updates, if they exist, or a lack of identification and fixing of open security issues.
And, of course, developer convenience if the project is still being actively worked on.
A Python-specific question is better suited to the !python@programming.dev community instead of the general programming one.
How do you conclude from unrealistic demands to no interest in peace?
What do you think the prospects of short and long-term peace are? What would you be willing to sacrifice for temporary "peace"?
They probably know better than us. No?
Given the announcement of edit replacing the old 32-bit MS-DOS edit.com with minimal footprint, I was surprised Microsoft considered multi-platform to even be in-scope.
I guess, given it's Rust, it was simple to say "sure, why not". But this ticket shows that you automatically have to discuss and handle multi-platform questions that arise.
Or "a novel published as authored by Lena McDonald contains AI prompt"
That 10 years ago.
Looks like they weren't able to borrow a 'was' for the sentence.
🤷 This didn't point out anything that's not a technical consequence and Microsoft planned for.
The overall ecosystem migration is not simple because of prevalence and variance in use, but it's still a huge net positive in my eyes.
I wouldn't call it messy. It's planned out, and the kind of process and concerns most senior devs are familiar with from any kind of tech migration. It's pretty clear with clear and well-defined concerns and solutions in my eyes.
That's what the major part of version numbers is all about! /s
I search with duckduckgo and the first results seem reasonable
Here's a signature and description https://www.khronos.org/opengl/wiki/Creating_an_OpenGL_Context_(WGL)#Create_Context_with_Attributes - khronos is publisher of OpenGL
here's the function I presume without attributes, so should be helpful to relate and compare https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/wingdi/nf-wingdi-wglcreatecontext
The EU passed laws that require companies (under conditions) to ensure base requirements in their supply chain.
I think a digital equivalent could be possible and similar. Requiring reasonable security and sustainability assessment.
It's not very obvious or simple to enforce, but would set requirements, and open up opportunities for fines and prosecution.
OCI does the platform hosting and development. OCF does the non-profit org work. OCF pays the OCI.
At least that's what I read from it.
I wouldn't be surprised if only weeks from now involved people announced a competing/new platform without this setup.
How viable is shifting from app to the web platform? Installable PWAs or PWA without installs.
Seems like it could be an alternative for most(?) things.