[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

Am Dienstag hatte Sanders auf seiner Website ein Statement zur Gewalt in Gaza und Israel veröffentlicht. Darin kritisierte er die Taten beider Seiten. Israels Blockade des Gazastreifens und der Lieferstopp von Nahrung, Wasser und anderen lebensnotwendigen Gütern seien ein "schwerer Bruch internationalen Rechts".

Das Aushungern eines Landes und Bombardierungen ziviler Infrastruktur zu kritisieren geht natürlich auch entschieden zu weit.

Ernsthaft wtf? Israels Reaktion zu verurteilen heißt jetzt man unterstützt damit automatisch Hamas?

Schade, hatte damals eigentlich echt Respekt vor der Frau aber hier ist sie glaube ich n paar mal falsch abgebogen.

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Hemelinger - Reicht doch 😓

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Danke Brudi, top gemacht!

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de -5 points 1 year ago

Surfshark worked well for me for a long time. Lots of servers, works well for unlocking region blocked content and it's pretty cheap. If you're into full privacy, I recently moved to AirVPN who accept payment through crypto, so you don't have to hand over user data except for an email (which doesn't have to be a real one, you can delete it later).

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You have a very odd understanding of what "secular state" means. It doesn't mean that the state can dictate where or how you're allowed to express you religion. It doesn't mean that some parts of religion are to be tolerated, where as those that you see as bad can be forbidden at will.

All it means, is that the state institutions, can't force you to partake in a religion or activities related to that religion. Kids who voluntarily want to express their religion are free to do so. Whether that kid is forced into following that religion, is not an issue of a "secular state".

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Sorry to burst your bubble, but people in other countries (like Germany) where they are allowed to display religious symbols are able to bond just fine. If you can't "bond" with someone because they're wearing a cross on a chain or cover their head with religious clothing, that sounds like a you-issue. Regardless of why they practice their religion, it's not up to you or the state to tell them how to practice it. Sure some are forced into it by their parents, but banning religious symbols in schools isn't going to fix that. What it does do however, is stop students from practicing a religion they freely chose.

This law is made by people who are intimidated by things they don't understand and that probably have their roots in racism and islamophobia.

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

So much for freedom of religion.

"When you walk into a classroom, you shouldn't be able to identify the pupils' religion just by looking at them,"

What a dumb fucking reason. Really, that's the best he could come up with? Why not? What's so bad about knowing someone's religion, when they are obviously not shy about it?

I get banning religious symbols from schools, because the institutes themselves are supposed to be non-religious (seperation of state and church and so on), but if the students themselves want to express their religion, let them.

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

What do you mean "when paired with your own clients"?

I just subscribed to AirVPN and while basic, their Eddie client is... serviceable :D

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Dota 2 and it doesn't. I just force it in. Playing with friends is a thing of the past as everyone has a job with a different schedule, has a spouse and so on...

[-] LazyKoala@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

It's Tencent so it's safe to say there will be both.

LazyKoala

joined 1 year ago