[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

the democratic party is largely a right wing conservative party, so i would assume so

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

theres no one cause for it, but the long list of stepping stones starts at american culture as a whole

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

condemning backwards policies, beliefs and actions is fine and good

condemning people for comforting themselves with something that harms no one is not, nor is it the first step of progress

its actually just being a zealous asshole

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

have you considered sodding off to an instance where being a lib is a bannable offense

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I am happy to see that you agree that storming an embassy is bad. Seriously because it is NOT obvious by what I replied to.

its not obvious whether they agree that storming an embassy is bad because they didnt say anything about the matter

I think just in general we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be (for lack of a better work) a dick. The sad thing is, we already don’t live in that world and this refugee that burned the Quran might have been burning it as a “dick move” or maybe he was burning it because he has a very real and hurtful story of how he became a refugee from Iraq.

this does not sound like you think we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be a dick

it sounds like making excuses, especially for someone complaining about folks making excuses

I can tell you I am biased toward any religion trying to tell me how to act. If I want to burn every holy book that I buy/own then I should be able to. Pushing your beliefs on others is wrong. Me burning a book doesn’t effect you unless you decide that it does. You forcing your religious laws on me does actually effect me even if I don’t believe in your religion

someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

What happens if I’m eating an unclean food infront of some extremist religious person? Do you think I’m trying to be offensive because I’m eating pork in public?

we arent talking about eating unclean food in front of some extremist person, equating the two is disingenuous

I’m not trying to schoolyard argue with you,

uhuh

I think giving up some acts of freedom of speech to religious extremists is a bad path to follow

someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

We shouldn’t push people to violent acts, but one could argue that the refugee himself was pushed to this “violent act” by the extremists in his home country

the man in sweden was not pushed to burn a book because of the political climate in another country a continent away

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

as opposed to saying things like 'religion is cancer', which isnt intended to provoke anyone

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

you dont actually get to say 'violence' instead of 'murder' in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from 'communists want to kill everyone' to 'well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed' to 'well having laws means killing people'

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If kumbaya is their plan, well, it isn’t going to succeed.

it sure seems like this is less about communists believing that violence is necessary, and more about you believing violence is necessary

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

actually, you distinctly said 'every communist ive pushed far enough', not 'literally every communist'

heres some that dont agree

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Lols

joined 1 year ago