what does that even mean? 'ok he supports a genocidal ethnostate, but its only cause of power projection in the middleeast'
you can tell because non capitalist societies dont have one
It’s pretty clear you somehow counted Ukraine being invaded by Russia as reason for Ukraine to not oppose the murderous embargo on Cuba
thats funny, 'it being pretty clear that i meant russia' is a weird reason for thinking i meant cuba
It’s pretty clear you somehow counted Ukraine being invaded by Russia as reason for Ukraine to not oppose the murderous embargo on Cuba, unrelated country on the other side of the world.
currently relying on military aid from the US government to deal with an ongoing invasion might be a reason to abstain from voting against an embargo being upheld by the US government
'the other US vassals' are generally not currently relying on military aid from the US government to deal with an ongoing invasion
i figured that was pretty clearly what i was talking about, what with it being the literal topic of the conversation:
They’re receiving a lot of military support from the US, so it’s not surprising that they’d at least be cautious about taking a position that might harm ties with the US.
theres nothing funny about it, its horrifying and exactly what israel wanted to happen
spread over the past 2 decades the actual number is closer to 2000
and that is reprehensible because killing kids is bad
and you dont have to bet, israel can keep count of their victims a lot better, we have a relatively accurate idea of how many there are
and that is reprehensible because killing kids is bad
why is this downvoted, pronouns after the name is a literal instance rule
fucking despise them, its disgusting that investing in renewables or green only became attractive to governments when it meant sending more money to fucking car manufacturers
using disorders as an insult is ableist
yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions
thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"
as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"
so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says
Lols
joined 1 year ago
the difference is that discussions about robocop are exclusively about the original
if youre convinced the wolfenstein and doom reboots have the same impact and relevance as robocop (2014) youre entirely allowed to stay that way, im not gonna try and shake you out of it