Sure but the title sounds interesting on it's own and prompted me to learn what it was. It's clickbait but there's no bait and switch when you visit the article.

And the description gives enough clue for me what the article is going to be about:

What happens when a large open source project dies.

Edit:

And I find that focusing too much about upvotes won't make for a good community experience. If the material is good the upvotes will eventually arrive.

or you can just read an actually interesting article

lower the price for consumers

😂

Was it between wars?

When it's been advertised to the user as "full self driving", is it?

I wouldn't believe an advertisement.

Only if it's about issues like genocide. "A sprinkle of genocide is fine" is what psychos think like.

Supporting palestine is not supporting terrorists. Can you tell me how many palestinian civilian casualties are recorded till now in Gaza? Can you tell me what is the number or Israelis who died as a result of IDF invasion into Gaza?

I don't agree with your argument.

Making a human go to prison for wiping out a family of 4 isn't going to bring back the family of 4. So you're just using deterrence to hopefully make drivers more cautious.

Yet, year after year.. humans cause more deaths by negligence than tools can cause by failing.

The question is definitely "How much safer are they compared to human drivers"

It's also much easier to prove that the system has those issues fixed compared to training a human hoping that their critical faculties are intact. Rigorous Software testing and mechanical testing are within legislative reach and can be made strict requirements.

Is "The Economy" rich people' share prices? Cause common citizens' lives are fucked worse.

"Overstepping its purpose" is key for "you were supposed to pretend to punish capitalists, not actually do it"

It's still is, but that would be a bad joke on my end.