Definitely not. Knee-jerk response. Do you not think about the impact of what you say to others?

Your argument makes sense and was not overly pessimistic. Ignore the people throwing a tantrum and storming out of the room. Was it really necessary to comment about how they are unsubscribing when the boring solution was quietly clicking the unsubscribe button and moving on with their day?

China bad! Yellow Peril!

Look, the commentor knows how to Google, but not well.

Every media source is biased, some are just open about their biases while others like to hide theirs. Take the time to read with a critical eye instead of dismissing the source because some website told you they couldn't be trusted.

There are plenty of examples of mainstream, Western sources publishing absolute garbage, they just have better optics.

The only empire is the US empire and the way they talk about themselves as an empire, they're proud of it too. Yell one-word feel-good slogans at them like "CHANGE", "FREEDOM", or "DEMOCRACY" and all the citizens shout and cheer because that's what they've always been told to do.

Try sitting during the pledge, the singing of the national anthem, or insulting the military. The US empire will have none of that. Truly the land of the free.

I agree with you on both points, but that is not the argument that I was making. If you need some more context, Here's just one of the many additional comments I left in this thread explaining my position.

FYI, citing the fact that the meme originated in China does not negate how it is used by others after the fact. It's like arguing that when neonazis use the swastika, it's ok because its actual origins are as an ancient religious symbol. The meanings of things can change and be used for reasons other than their original intention.

I'm not saying the meme is racist, I'm saying that it's being used in a racist way here, specifically in the form of Sinophobia.

There's plenty of more recent examples, but I'm not going to go to the effort to dig up more in a conversation where the majority of the replies I get boil down to "nuh-uh, I saw different online stupid tankie."

If 2006 is the year that you landed on, I'll again point you to the two specific names I dropped, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, both of whom experienced this with the US and allies more recently.

Do you see why I wouldn't bother putting the effort into finding a better source? The low effort replies and baseless personal attacks are all over this thread. Even the people I gave the benefit of the doubt to while replying didn't reply in good faith.

What do you feel like you've added to the conversation by trying to personally attack me? Does it feel good to attack someone behind the protection of anonymity? I wonder, if we did meet face-to-face, would you have the courage and strength of character to engage with me in a conversation as a fellow human worthy of respect despite our differences in belief or would you still hide behind weak, uninspiring insults as you have here?

Is it that people don't notice the source or that they prefer sources that are open about their biases? How is it any less useful to know that this source is generally pushing a pro-China story when we also know that the NYT, BBC, etc will push a pro-US and pro-NATO bias and then strut around pretending that they are somehow balanced and unbiased?

Talk about eating up propaganda...

A big part of seeing through the bias of an organization is reading around through other sources with different biases and then taking a critical look at all of them so you can get closer to what is actually going on and challenge your own biases. I find the users on Lemmy tend to actually read the sources that are provided whereas people are so bad about reading sources posted to Reddit that commenters not reading the source became a meme on Reddit.

This comment is just another example of the pretentious Redditor attitude that an exudes an air of, "Here, let me grace you all with my superior intellect as you are all a bunch of uncultured swine." Instead of blindly applying a negative judgement against the community, why don't you stop and think about why it may be this way? Better yet, ask others why they read outside of mainstream sources instead of assuming you know better.

No source is ever unbiased and to pretend otherwise and place sources that confirm your own bias on a pedestal is pure, uncritical drivel. Be critical of the Chinese media, but don't pretend that Western sources are any better. Every public communication you see from any organization is propaganda.

I don't think it's necessary to freeze it, but idk for sure if you'll see a meaningful change in flavor or texture after freezing.

Usually you can store garlic long-term in a cool, dark place like with other root vegetables, but you need to dry it out first.

Here's a link to a page on curing and storing garlic you've grown at home.

I expect the responses I'm receiving. I don't respond expecting any change, I respond with the hope that once in awhile, someone may come along and read a comment that makes them question the narratives that they've been taught to blindly accept.

I hope that people can look beyond the propaganda they are hit with and realize that continuing to support this conflict will do nothing to help the Ukrainian citizens. What it will do is create a situation where Ukraine is perpetually indebted to NATO countries and the companies within that wish to exploit Ukraine, further enrich the morally bankrupt military industry, and produce dangerous conditions that the Ukrainian and Russian people will be paying for with their health for decades to come similar to what we see in Laos, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Allowing comments with underlying messages and assumptions that dehumanize a people to go uncontested has already led to widespread acceptance of racism towards "the other," which is something that is always unacceptable.

I hope people will quit swallowing the tepid justifications for war that the rich and their puppets push. Splitting those of us who have to pay the costs of their destruction along ideological lines that don't even get to the root of the problem wastes our energy on meaningless discourse and further stabilizes the dictatorship the rich have nearly the entire world under.

How many countries have Russia and China, combined, bombed in the last 10 years?

How many countries has the US alone bombed in the last 10 years?

It's a shame you don't really wonder why people don't describe Russia or China as part of the imperial core, because if you bothered to engage in arguments in good faith, maybe you could finally get the taste of boot off your tongue.

Oof. Check out what retirement ages were in the USSR. They were very similar to China with options to retire earlier if you worked more physically demanding jobs.

Turns out retirement ages in the imperial core have always been worse and since there is no big bad red to be scared of, the capitalists don't feel the need to make the same kind of concessions they needed to make to prevent similar uprisings in their country in the past.

Your life is being stolen from you for someone else's profit. It will always be this way under a capitalist system.