I'm a communist who likes cats and puns. If you can make a compelling argument for how celebrating Mao in the form of a cat pun has a basis in racism and the historical oppression of a people, I'm ready to change it.
I think you misinterpreted part of what I'm saying. The use of the meme in Taiwan and Hong Kong were political dissent, not racism.
The use of the meme in NATO countries is racist due to their history of racism and because this is one of the tools these governments use to convince you that China is your enemy and you should support military actions against them before their military becomes stronger than that of the US and they lose their monopoly on international power and subsequently their power to bully the rest of the world.
Before you dismiss this argument by saying it's just because Xi doesn't like the meme, where did you get this information? From what I've seen the Chinese government has not responded and the reasoning behind the ban is purely speculative. Sure, I believe they banned the comparison as it was the basis of geopolitical dissent, but to claim it's because a world leader who gets insulted frequently and in worse ways has thin skin is a stretch. He has bigger worries than Westerners tweeting at him.
If you want a tool to fight the power of dictators, you'd be better served focusing on organizing the citizens of your own country against the powers that work against their interests at home. They point you toward foreign leaders and say "look, they're worse" so you won't criticize the shit job your own "representatives" are doing at home.
Right, because if you allow racist tropes a little bit of leeway they won't become normalized and propagate over time.
How has voting in your bastion of democracy been working out for you? Did you get to vote to go to war? It's not like your leaders are any less authoritarian.
Why did this CNN article not address the issues with falsified rape reports from Ukrainian officials? Seems like they didn't bother to do a proper job exploring the issue. This isn't to deny that sexual assault is occuring in the conflict, it is instead meant to counter the broad painting of racist tropes being spread about Russian "Orcs" raping everywhere they go.
Rape tends to go hand-in-hand with war no matter which country is the invader. Something you'll need to contend with at the personal level is that if you are war-mongering, you are indirectly supporting sexual assaults among the people involved in the conflict. Maybe you should reconsider your justifications of war.
Haha, casual sexism is funny when it's a sibling!