[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

I love end stage capitalism and government control ❤

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 7 points 22 hours ago

didn't even know that the mockup PSN network on the rpcs3 was a thing that is amazing

43
submitted 23 hours ago by OppressedBread@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@beehaw.org

Dude I remember when pcsx2 was struggling to run on my computer unless I heavily tweak some settings, now it just works.

Even more amazing and jaw dropping is that I could now emulate these games on my phone, I tried ARMSX2 and it was stable enough that I 3D printed myself a phone holder that snaps onto my controller for on the go ps2 gaming.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm willing to take a fat loss on memory if it means I'm leaving a predatory ecosystem.

also true on the gold subscription, ps plus is also going up and I'm not willing to tolerate it more

29

I really dislike their new DRM update even if its "testing the waters" , after being a fan for so long I'm set to completely drop them by the end of this year (yes I'm waiting for gta6).

I managed to convince my normie friends to switch with me to PC gaming by being their IT support 😂

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 days ago

I particularly enjoy European based companies because of their customer service.

one time I had an issue where tutanota double charged me, I sent one email saying "I got double charged" without giving much context or having to explain myself, they replied within minutes and fixed the issue without me needing to do further action.

American companies could never.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

seeing how the tech space is around here and digging more into binaries, they most probably outsourced their stuff, that third party company probably blocked GOS out of discretion, I don't imagine they actually asked for that.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

it be like that sometimes

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

no, that's a well known workaround, but the banking apps I used were just giving me a generic error, while yes they used google play integrity API, they weren't enforcing it.

what it turns out is that they were checking for specific packages that come preinstalled with every copy of GOS, effectively blocking users of said operating system.

Luckily these packages aren't essential and could be disabled by users, bypassing their checks.

this is one of many that they implemented, there are 3 other checks but it was easy to bypass those too without compromise.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

good point, I'm leaning towards just changing the device model in the report and calling it a day.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I have to use it, its part of my daily life, but thank you for your response.

39
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by OppressedBread@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Hey everyone, Hope you all having a good day today, I apologize in advance for this long read but TLDR will be at the bottom.

There's this potential issue I'm facing right now and I need some opinions on how to go about this or maybe I'm overthinking this situation.

Context: I'm Running a google pixel phone with grapheneOS for about a month now, without any sandboxed google play services, the experience has been amazing and so freeing, this switch was overdue since all of my services are open source / privacy respecting or self hosted solutions, this was the last step to finally be "free" and I just got up one day and decided to bite the bullet, buying the phone with cash.

BUT i made the rookie mistake of not checking banking app compatibility and as luck would have it, my banking apps outright blocked GOS users and no settings would work

Luckily with some patience and a bit of RE magic, I managed to come up with bypasses for 2 local banking apps in a little over 3 hours, it was laughably easy and any user could pull it off without changing any settings or installing anything.

issue: Here's the potential problem.

Now we may all know the Privsec GOS banking app compatibility list at first I was over the moon to make a useful contribution ESPECIALLY to a list like this.

And then it dawned on me, I'll be potentially shooting myself in the foot and here's how:

1-I live in a relatively small country that isn't mentioned anywhere in this list, I'll be the first one in my nation to make a contribution, while yes we do have wiggle room for internet freedom, the local government showed that it will not tolerate moves that will encourage the masses to take privacy routes, basically "if you're gonna do it, shut up about it or we're gonna come after you" it did happen before.

2-The population pool is small, to make matters worse, Google pixel phones aren't even a thing here, I had to REALLY dig around to find someone that sold these brand new, the second hand market is just as bad, no one is selling these phones so I imagine that people who actually have these phones here can be counted on my fingers.

3-The bank I'm using most probably already logged the phone type, It wouldn't be so hard for them to connect the dots if they got alerted about my bypass solutions, The privsec fill out forum needs me to include my phone model name and build number, potentially leading to a full OPSEC compromise.

Verdict / Thoughts:

I'm split on this issue, part of me things I'm over thinking the shit out of this situation and I'm over estimating their capabilities.

The other part is telling me that I'll be destroying my opsec and I should stop.

I'm thinking of falsifying Device name / model on the forum to avoid this but I don't know if this is even enough and I don't want to mislead other users.

TLDR: Local Banking apps blocked GOS, came up with a bypass but not enough people use Google pixel phones locally and this may lead to a full OPSEC compromise if I posted about it.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

thank you so much, another thing I also missed when looking over the technical aspect of it, I'm saving this for future reference.

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

saving this reply for future reference, thanks!

[-] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

yeah its something that seems to be splitting the community, some say that they haven't had a single problem while others say its borderline impossible

61

Hello everyone, nice to meet you all.

This question was probably asked around here but is it really possible to be your own mail provider?

I think I'm experienced enough when it comes to homelabbing that I could take on something like this.

I THINK im aware of the technicalities, I did some research but it still begs the question, is it really worth it? would it be hard to build up a reputation so that your emails don't land in spam folders?

view more: next ›

OppressedBread

joined 4 days ago