[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago

To measure how much linen went into them, duh

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago
[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

Oh there's a whole Wikipedia page on the subject

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

Oh nooooooo...

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

You know what they say, if 13 people sit at a table with a Republican you have 14 Republicans

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Looking at US Government

So you can't house your people, feed your people, provide healthcare to your people, or apparently even protect your people.

What would you say you do around here?

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Break chains, get gains

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

"In hell they don't even allow tennis shoes. They are forced to make them for pennies a day for demon party leaders while going barefoot. You can't imagine that under capitalism."

image

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

And then you'll look at the cost of a house vs the median income for them versus yourself...

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Wearable > implantation

Just a security concern. Augmenting is great but we don't want the augmentations to become a liability. Obviously there are exceptions to every rule, if we invent a robotic arm replacement for someone who's lost one, the security concerns are generally lower than the quality of life improvement of having a functioning arm 99% of the time, and there's an argument for the potential ability for rapid detachment in case of emergency, but once we get into subdermal and brain implants, we're in a territory where these things can't be easily removed in case of emergency, and the risks get immense.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

OprahsedCreature

joined 3 years ago