the nuclear strikes on Japan killed less than the conventional firebombing runs leading up to it, and if nukes wouldn’t have been used a shit ton more people would have died.

That's an absolutely disgusting thing to say. Japan was already surrendering, they were only nuked as a show of strength.

I'm not sure what you imply when you say that "a shit ton more people would have died", but if you're saying that the US should have napalm bombed an entire surrendering country just to make an example, I don't think it makes your argument valid. It's not ok to do something horrible, just because you could have done something even worse if you had wanted to.

If anyone would like more context about the kind of think they were posting:

If you want to meet leftist, you will meet people who are against NATO and who know all the evil the USA has done. Those are entities that have spent the last 100 years genociding left leaning people with the help of fascist groups all around the world, so of course we aren't friendly to them. If you aren't aware of that, you may be from Europe, so I suggest you research Operation Gladio to have an example of what they did here, to their supposed allied countries.

If you're not open to those ideas, I really don't understand why you were hoping to meet leftists.

They block a shit ton of instances, not always for good reasons. Often to maintain an echo chamber.

I doubt the people in Rostov are the ones who were in Czechoslovakia in 1968.

Whole grain pasta.

Lentils.