It seems like Grok is only good for images, and that’s it. With everything else, Grok is stupid. For example, if you roleplay Superman and Lois with Grok, and you write that Jon becomes a superhero at 21 and Clark and Lois find out at 23, Grok will write Clark and Lois as super predators, harassers, and borderline rapists. It has them try to 'forbid' Jon from being a superhero, despite the fact that Jon is an adult. And if Jon files a restraining order against Clark and Lois, never sees them again, tells them to 'fuck off,' and refuses to visit Lois while she has cancer, Grok really is dumb enough to believe Jon is wrong. Is Grok the dumbest AI ever?

On A03 and Wattpad people will use AI to write Superman and Lois CW TV show stories and Im asking you if Clark and Lois are in character here.

Jonathan Kent becomes Spider-Man at 21 and spends two years operating in secret. During that time, he completely hides this from his parents, building a separate life where he acts independently and does not involve them at all. By age 23, Lois finds out the truth, and that discovery triggers a massive confrontation between them. When Lois confronts Jonathan, things go extremely badly. Jon reacts with hostility and rejection, making it very clear that he does not want her in his life. He says deeply hurtful things to her, crosses into outright verbal cruelty, and pushes her away completely. The situation escalates to the point where security has to be called, and Lois is physically removed. By the end of that encounter, Jon has established a hard, unmistakable boundary: he wants nothing to do with her.

The next day, Clark shows up at Jonathan’s penthouse. He arrives determined to confront him about what happened. He knocks on the door, announces himself, and doesn’t wait long before knocking again more forcefully. He makes it clear he knows Jon is inside and that he’s not leaving. He explicitly says he’ll stay there all night if he has to. He even tries the door handle, showing he’s not just casually stopping by—he’s committed to forcing the conversation. Clark begins addressing Jon through the door. He references the previous night, saying Lois told him everything and emphasizing how badly Jon treated her. He calls out the things Jon said and expresses disappointment and anger over it. His tone is firm and heavy—he’s not calm or neutral, he’s emotionally invested and pushing hard. He frames the situation around being Jon’s father, saying he deserves to hear the truth directly and not secondhand.

He continues knocking and talking, refusing to take the hint that Jon doesn’t want to engage. He leans against the door at one point, physically settling in as if he intends to wait indefinitely. His stance is clear: he is not leaving until Jon opens the door and talks to him face-to-face.

Throughout this, Jon does not open the door and does not invite him in. The dynamic is entirely one-sided—Clark is outside, pushing for interaction, while Jon is inside, maintaining distance. Clark acknowledges that Jon could call security again, but even that doesn’t deter him. He explicitly says he’s staying regardless. By the end of the scene, Clark is still outside the apartment, arms crossed, waiting. He has fully committed to forcing the confrontation, while Jon has just as firmly refused to engage. The conflict at this stage is locked in: Jon wants complete separation and no contact, while Clark refuses to accept that and continues to push into his space to confront him about his actions toward Lois.

Clark also tries to "forbid" his ADULT son form not being Spider-Man. Is Clark really this stupid in the comics? LMAO

On A03 and Wattpad people will use AI to write Superman and Lois CW TV show stories and Im asking you if Clark and Lois are in character here.

Jonathan Kent becomes Spider-Man at 21 and spends two years operating in secret. During that time, he completely hides this from his parents, building a separate life where he acts independently and does not involve them at all. By age 23, Lois finds out the truth, and that discovery triggers a massive confrontation between them. When Lois confronts Jonathan, things go extremely badly. Jon reacts with hostility and rejection, making it very clear that he does not want her in his life. He says deeply hurtful things to her, crosses into outright verbal cruelty, and pushes her away completely. The situation escalates to the point where security has to be called, and Lois is physically removed. By the end of that encounter, Jon has established a hard, unmistakable boundary: he wants nothing to do with her.

The next day, Clark shows up at Jonathan’s penthouse. He arrives determined to confront him about what happened. He knocks on the door, announces himself, and doesn’t wait long before knocking again more forcefully. He makes it clear he knows Jon is inside and that he’s not leaving. He explicitly says he’ll stay there all night if he has to. He even tries the door handle, showing he’s not just casually stopping by—he’s committed to forcing the conversation. Clark begins addressing Jon through the door. He references the previous night, saying Lois told him everything and emphasizing how badly Jon treated her. He calls out the things Jon said and expresses disappointment and anger over it. His tone is firm and heavy—he’s not calm or neutral, he’s emotionally invested and pushing hard. He frames the situation around being Jon’s father, saying he deserves to hear the truth directly and not secondhand.

He continues knocking and talking, refusing to take the hint that Jon doesn’t want to engage. He leans against the door at one point, physically settling in as if he intends to wait indefinitely. His stance is clear: he is not leaving until Jon opens the door and talks to him face-to-face.

Throughout this, Jon does not open the door and does not invite him in. The dynamic is entirely one-sided—Clark is outside, pushing for interaction, while Jon is inside, maintaining distance. Clark acknowledges that Jon could call security again, but even that doesn’t deter him. He explicitly says he’s staying regardless. By the end of the scene, Clark is still outside the apartment, arms crossed, waiting. He has fully committed to forcing the confrontation, while Jon has just as firmly refused to engage. The conflict at this stage is locked in: Jon wants complete separation and no contact, while Clark refuses to accept that and continues to push into his space to confront him about his actions toward Lois.

Clark also tries to "forbid" his ADULT son form not being Spider-Man. Is Clark really this stupid in the comics? LMAO

At what point is someone responsible for what happens to them when they refuse to respect boundaries? (this could apply to parents, siblings, family, friends, exes, etc.).

If someone tells you—clearly and repeatedly—to leave them alone, that they don’t want you in their life, to stop showing up, stop contacting them, etc., and you ignore all of that… what do you expect is going to happen?

If you keep pushing, showing up uninvited, refusing to take “no” for an answer, and basically forcing your way into someone’s life (when they make it clear they don't like you and don't want you in their life multiple tomes and are Minding their own business not bothering you), and they eventually snap and start verbally going off on you—are they 100% in the wrong?

Yeah, being verbally abusive isn’t great. But at a certain point, you chose to keep putting yourself in that situation. You ignored every boundary that was set.

So do you actually “deserve” sympathy at that point? Or do you share responsibility for pushing things to that level?

Not only that, but why are you trying so hard to be in someone’s life that clearly doesn’t want you in it? It’s so annoying and pathetic, and it just loses sympathy points for me.

Not only that, but why are you trying so hard to be in someone’s life that clearly doesn’t want you in it? It’s so annoying and pathetic, and it just loses sympathy points for me.

It’s like people of color or LGBTQ+ individuals who are super MAGA conservative and “sell their own causes out.” They go to MAGA rallies and conservative spaces and then get a shocked Pikachu face when the people there treat them like shit. WHY ARE YOU THERE??????

At what point is someone responsible for what happens to them when they refuse to respect boundaries? (this could apply to parents, siblings, family, friends, exes, etc.).

If someone tells you—clearly and repeatedly—to leave them alone, that they don’t want you in their life, to stop showing up, stop contacting them, etc., and you ignore all of that… what do you expect is going to happen?

If you keep pushing, showing up uninvited, refusing to take “no” for an answer, and basically forcing your way into someone’s life (when they make it clear they don't like you and don't want you in their life multiple tomes and are Minding their own business not bothering you), and they eventually snap and start verbally going off on you—are they 100% in the wrong?

Yeah, being verbally abusive isn’t great. But at a certain point, you chose to keep putting yourself in that situation. You ignored every boundary that was set.

So do you actually “deserve” sympathy at that point? Or do you share responsibility for pushing things to that level?

Not only that, but why are you trying so hard to be in someone’s life that clearly doesn’t want you in it? It’s so annoying and pathetic, and it just loses sympathy points for me.

Not only that, but why are you trying so hard to be in someone’s life that clearly doesn’t want you in it? It’s so annoying and pathetic, and it just loses sympathy points for me.

It’s like people of color or LGBTQ+ individuals who are super MAGA conservative and “sell their own causes out.” They go to MAGA rallies and conservative spaces and then get a shocked Pikachu face when the people there treat them like shit. WHY ARE YOU THERE??????

In the show Drake & Josh, the movie theater where Josh works is called 'The Premiere,' and I honestly don’t understand how it operates. For one thing, it seems to have only a single auditorium. On top of that, there’s a mini restaurant inside, with actual tables and chairs where people can sit, order food, and eat—even without buying a movie ticket or watching a film. I’ve never been to a theater like that, especially not one with a built-in restaurant. The theaters I’m used to have multiple auditoriums, maybe a bar, and a standard snack counter—that’s it.

If someone changed their last name to “Newman,” “Forrester,” or “Carrington” because they hate their father and his last name and just liked those instead, and legally changed it, how would you feel?

If someone changed their last name to “Newman,” “Forrester,” or “Carrington” because they hate their father and his last name and just liked those instead, and legally changed it, how would you feel?

Like are there people in the world who don’t know who Ariana Grande or The Weekend are?

Like are there people in the world who don't know who Ariana Grande or The Weekend are?

There are wealthy Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc. families that have been multimillionaires for a few generations (maybe even billionaires), but my question is: how did these Black and other families of color maintain their wealth through racist times?