Youve got a hell of an imagination going here.

Was this ever a WoW skin? If not, it sure is time for

The link does not work for me?

I think the issue is in national parties and politicians not with the cop itself.

I think not having meteorological anomalies on a yearly basis, growing crops in a climate where humanity evolved, and having no dead zones on the planet is on a little bit different step of the hierarchy of needs than what people have different consideration on.

Fighting is a harsh word.

If you dont go for a climate dictatorship, fighting will lead us nowhere except for more rigid opinions and frustration.

You ever convinced someone while punching him in the face?

Did you read the article?

I for sure didnt.

Thanks for highlighting that.

I was carried away by having the discussions at my university with my peers in mind.

Copying+pasting the output of chatGPT without ever looking at it, or even using a language tool to publish thoughts that were never in your head to begin with, is the actual concern

Nevertheless I dont understand why this is a concern.

The scientific standards existed decades if not already at least a century.

Those discussions are putting chatgpt in a bad light. However the fact that our scientific system was eroded and made a mockery of before the introduction of chatgpt is not highlighted.

There are still plagiarizations around and nobody cares. Mostly because of political sensitivity.

However science has failed to repel "bad actors" (intentional or unintentional) from the scene.

I dont know when. And why. But publisher have for sure something to do with it.

Thats another point. Fair enough.

But still I dont think that science will stall just because of chatgpt.

Journalism? Will for sure. But scientific publications have a systemic problem (like publisher-polism, pubscores etc) And outsourcing writing work to chargpt is - in my opinion - non of them.

I think of it as in another anology.

Compare a screwdriver with a power tool.

Does the convenient solution hinder you from building your house simply because you cant "feel" the strength of the wood while turning the screw in?

i doubt.

The things you mentioned are coming into play when people think of AI as a god mode. As a user you are solely responsible for how to use a tool. If the user overestimates the power of the tool or use it for the wrong things. Its the users fault.

The scientist is still a scientist. Which is the author of the paper. Not gpt because it writes filler text or puts the scientists thoughts into sentences.

The context is still at the scientists plate. If the scientist does a poorly job at reviewing the gpts output. Gpt cant be faulted.

Just out of curiosity? Why do you care about the account separation?

Like the instance recognizes the same origin anyway?

And why not just create throwaways if anonymity is important?

You won lemmy today.

Good job. :)

Ok Now I understand.

Didnt knew that rclone was capable.

Well, that actually changes the situation. maybe I should still look into seafile.

Whats your hardware? i will try it on a RPi4, since I have read about nextcloud being a hog resource wise I hope seafile will be more calm