[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago

Everything does happen for a reason. In many cases, it happens because some evil prick has not been properly dealt with.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 15 points 1 month ago

Indeed it is so.

Nevertheless, assholes.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 16 points 2 months ago

That girl is not wanting for hugs.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 14 points 3 months ago

Lost the Trade War with China.

Starting a Trade War with the EU in the hopes of a victory. Sadly, the EU just saw exactly how to win.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 16 points 3 months ago

I do my best every two years or so. It's like trying to put out the sun with a mouthful of water in this state.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

Huh. Never realized chromebooks were priced that low.

Thanks for the correction.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 14 points 3 months ago

people don’t need a guide when using a chat bot that tells them how they should treat and interact with it.

Then why are people always surprised to find out that chat bots will make shit up to answer their questions?

People absolutely need a guide for using a chat bot, because people are idiots.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

That confused me at first, but I realized that he's speaking "orders of magnitude," which means that 365 rounds to 100.

It's mostly done in physics, and briefly, your only count the number of digits. If I'm comparing a number with 3 zeros to a number with 12 zeroes, the actual number hardly matters.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

Gambet, part 2, I believe.

That scene is wonderful, and gave me entirely unrealistic expectations for my workplace.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 15 points 4 months ago

So the people upset about the wrongdoing can be punished, but the people who wrongdid are not able to be punished?

Fascinating.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 16 points 5 months ago

And yet Trump lives. I guess that proves the theory wrong.

I've never been so disappointed to have a conspiracy disproved.

[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 17 points 5 months ago

If only someone had warned people that mass surveillance would be used for purposes that most voters are opposed to.

Most laws of the limits of surveillance are based on the understanding that it requires time, effort, and expenditure of limited resources to observe someone. We don't require a warrant for publicly available information, like a cop following you around, and writing down where I go all day, because we understand that no police department is going to spend an officers time like that for no reason. It's a self-limiting decision. Similarly, the records of such observation would be limited in scope to the period of time that I have an officer assigned to me. They can't decide today that they want to have been observing me last week.

But with cameras and data storage, booth of those limits are removed. It costs nothing to observe and record where I go all day. Further, they can decide today that they want to have observed me last week, and just pull the data out of the archives.

With this in mind, the general understanding of "publicly available information" needs to be reconsidered, and the laws about what the government is allowed to collect and store about me needs to be updated.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

SaltSong

joined 5 months ago