[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Liar liar stocks on fire

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

This theme is a little too dark

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

You see, Meta has billions, which puts them above the law. Also they make their investors happy, most likely

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Probably the bots listening part. The point for the royalties is to get people to use the software and pay for it

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

I don't understand why can't the CEO be remote. They can buy all their important staff Apple Vision Pros if they'd like and it'll still be cheaper than this

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 127 points 2 months ago

For me it's: Inciting violence, justifying conspiracy theories, Trump becoming president

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

I see the North Korea visit was pretty useful

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

Don't hate the player, the owner is the one to blame

2
submitted 11 months ago by Scolding7300@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Lyft disabled scheduling rides through ride.lyft.com, I used that quite a bit but now in forced go use the app. The problem however, is that their app just doesn't work. It launches, says the Google API is necessary and then continues to close.

Does anyone know of an app that use their API that doesn't shut itself down without installing Google SDK?

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

In my view it's either my ISP seeing everything or someone else. I don't trust my ISP, I route my traffic to a different country where I don't live in and them viewing my activity is potentially less of a problem, in my view (just in case they do manage to de-anonymize me)

67
submitted 11 months ago by Scolding7300@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I saw an article awhile ago that the police just straight up bought ad-network data about someone they were prosecuting without needing a warrant. Is there anyway to know what info ad networks have on me out there?

I know there are databrokers you can query to see what they have kn you, but those are all public records from I could find so far

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Answer: Signal

I wish people would use Signal, but Telegram is the closest thing to a sane privacy policy I've got. There are a few that luckily agreed to use Signal.

Waiting on interoperability, see how that's implemented in Signal+WhatsApp (hopefully with Telegram to so I can ditch that).

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Or abandon the min parking reqs so developers can build something else there. But also solar panels where we actually need parking space

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

If each chat connection gets a unique ID and zero info on my [pseudo]identity then that's great! Otherwise if this means they'll plug me into their social network to profile me that way - nah, thanks

44
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Scolding7300@lemmy.world to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one

A lot of privacy guides suggest avoiding Telegram. I understand that in its default mode there's no E2EE (and no E2EE for groups at all). If people I know don't wanttko use Signal, isn't Telegram the lesser evil given it's nicer privacy policy (than other popular ones)?

Say I use the FOSS version of it.

view more: next ›

Scolding7300

joined 1 year ago