US gained the rights to legally murder its own citizens without due process under Obama.

Also loads of giving corporations and capital rights, and rolling back protective anti-investment gambling under Democrat administrations, which ate up the rights of non-capital.

The best solution for the people of the PRC and the State of Taiwan (RoC), and to undercut US imperial goals in the Asian Pacific is for the PRC to recognise an indepent Taiwan, in return for not being excluded from semi conductors and having free passage through territorial waters (and throw in recognition of PRC claims in South China Sea if you like).

Without the threat of invasion and a normalisation of ties both will help both economically and socially, and the shared cultural links will pull them together over time; and it ties the US's hands in meddling.

I think it's a little racist to remove agency from people who've made moves equally validly explained as self-defence and preservation against a hostile invader.

Isn't Biollante a kaiju?

And it is people more like the comrade in this meme than the capitalist wearing a rainbow token who got us here, and there is still work to do.

Does Kerala (though only a state and receives national funds) or Allendé's Chile (Overthrown by US supported military coup after a couple of years) count, or do they not for the reasons in brackets or others?

The writer here, rereporting another interview seems fairly Musk tolerant.

RDJ probably is too. But at least he's calling him on a few things.

Or ended up as a priest caste, or a third gender, or were accepted as the gender they expressed in some non-European parts of the world.

I think it's about the way Charon and Neptune both influence it's orbit and rotation, in ways that, for instance, the Moon doesn't with Earth.

So the Japanese names of the Kanto badges are just their colour.

We can probably chalk the odd name up to the translator not having played the game through and muddling the order, or just bizzare Gen 1 choices.

Addresses is the main one.

But also when talking about objects and categories, e.g. "the oak is a type of tree", not "trees have a type which is oak".

They do tend to do better when more mechanisms of the state are on their side, though. (But yes that doesn't mean voting alone defeats them.)