Makes you think

It'd be a civil war and non-politicians would necessarily have to be recruited.

Using force when fascists are trying to do a little genocide does have historical precedent.

If you want. We could use a bit more magic in the world.

Social democracy is democratic socialism. It's reformist socialism.

What people actually usually mean is social liberalism, which is liberalism with pretensions of empathy.

Address the point, coward.

USA is also responsible. Fucking obviously.

I live in Denmark. We're sending absurd amounts of military aid. The commie party supports this on the basis that Ukrainians have an indisputable right to defend themselves. I agree with that, but there's obviously room for discussing what exactly that implies in terms of support.

All billionaires should go jump off a bridge. Liberal politicians should take a trip to the Titanic, and I have a very nice wall I want to show the billionaire who bankrolled the Danish libertarian party.

I'd be more than happy to have a conversation about the conflict that isn't just parroting neoliberal talking points, but as I said, this is a litmus test. If you can't state unequivocally that Putin, a murderous billionaire, deserves to die, then you're not any kind of socialist I can recognize, and I'll have no further interest in talking with you.

It's a litmus test for whether I want to engage with you at all.

Being able to state unequivocally that a murderous billionaire should drop dead is the absolute bare minimum for a socialist.

I have yet to get a straight answer from so-called socialists on Lemmy.

By deflecting blame from Russia.

Do you agree that Putin should drop dead?

Russia escalated. More people are dying now.

It's meaningless in terms of legislation and enforcement.

Skimmed the article, missed that part.