25

As by that point I hope we'll have better inside jokes and things to discuss

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 82 points 1 year ago

There are "questions about sex" and there are "men/women of reddit/lemmy, what's the sexiest sex you ever sexed" being repeated every other day like on r/askreddit. I assume nobody would reject the occasional insightful sex questions.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe, with Authorized Fetch (what Mastodon calls secure mode) blocking intermediaries won't be needed, as instances will have to cryptographically "authorize" themselves to receive/send data, and you can just say "no" to any requests coming from threads.net, acting basically as a "defederation enforcement mode".

I could be wrong though, haven't caught up on the exact details.

1
42

We're getting plenty of posts regarding selfhosting Lemmy, but with Twitter simultaneously imploding in on itself I assume a fair few of us here have brought up/thinking of bringing up our own microblogging as well.

Lemmy is the best case scenario when it comes to discoverability within single-user instances, as you can just start following communities and start socializing almost immediately, whereas on Mastodon & co you need to build up a follower base before hashtags and whatnot start federating and it starts being more than just "you shouting out into the void".

So what I'm proposing here is a thread to share your selfhosted fedi presence outside Lemmy, so we can kickstart the discoverability process among each other, and slowly integrate our single-user/low-user/just new in general instances into the wider fediverse.

I guess I'll start off first: You can find me as @shittykopper@toots.w.on-t.work. I haven't posted all that much yet because of the above "shouting out into the void" feeling though, so it's pretty empty for now.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Microservices aren't a silver bullet. There's likely quite a lot that can be done until we need to split some parts out, and once that happens I expect that federation would be the thing to split out as that's one of the more "active" parts of the app compared to logins and whatnot.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's generally more like "Steve's 10 eur/mo cloud server in which they run ten other things next to Lemmy, which is written by two devs and barely held together by duct tape and prayers"

But that doesn't change the overall point.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 23 points 1 year ago

With how unreliable tallying votes over federation is, we're kinda get vote fuzzing "for free" right now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP-rGJKSZ3s

Your server sent the subscription request to the community's server, but the acknowledgement never made it through amidst the chaos of federation. You're still subscribed.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Any admin worth their salt's gonna defederate them and proudly wear the Misfit Loser Zealot label[^1]. The only people who'll federate with them are the naive techbros and those who only care about how much users they have, compared to, idk, being committed to creating a good community.

https://fedipact.online is already gaining steam with the Mastodon side of the fediverse.

[^1]: Seriously the markdown guy couldn't've picked a better description if he tried.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On the software side, we already have PeerTube. It's just the logistics of hosting video are way too expensive for most people to be able to cover:

  • You need drives to store all those videos, preferably in several quality and codec variants so everyone can watch them.
  • You need the bandwidth to serve all those videos. PeerTube can "smooth over" the initial new upload bump by using WebTorrents, which is the least worst solution if you quietly ignore all the "but muh IP address" people, but once people stop watching at the same time, you're back to square one.
  • Transcoding requires powerful and specialized hardware. Nobody in their right mind will serve videos the same way they're uploaded, especially with the rise of new codecs like VP9 or god forbid AV1, which you simply can't encode on a consumer CPU unless you're fine waiting hours/days for a single upload to go through.
[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 12 points 1 year ago

There are so many Linuxy YouTube Guys With Terrible Politics(tm) that it's really not that hard to confuse them with each other.

20

Also available in non-video form at https://gekk.info/articles/hyperspace.htm

Not entirely sure how well it would fit this community given it's "nerdiness", but here is a hour and a bit long video of a rather interesting explanation of a BIOS vendor committing metaphorical crimes against the ways most computers expect themselves to work -- all for very little gain.

I recommend checking out Cathode Ray Dude's other videos as well, his channel is really good and he just started working full time on it.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 11 points 1 year ago

Video hosting is way more resource intensive (and therefore expensive) than text and even the most image filled of Lemmy communities

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 24 points 1 year ago

If this comment is federating then I started hosting my first service -- Lemmy itself.

view more: next ›

ShittyKopper

joined 1 year ago