if you are referring to the method and work (aka. Marxism/ML), is something that you have asserted but not proven.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-alexander-berkman-bolsheviks-shooting-anarchists

"But of all the revolutionary elements in Russia it is the Anarchists who now suffer the most ruthless and systematic persecution. Their suppression by the Bolsheviki began already in 1918, when — in the month of April of that year — the Communist Government attacked, without provocation or warning, the Anarchist Club of Moscow and by the use of machine guns and artillery “liquidated” the whole organisation."

Emma goldman

Sankara isn't a non-tankie just because he didn't live to the tankie phase, he was always acting as an ML.

I believe there is a difference in being ML and having police state aspirations/trending authoritarian. Which is when I use the term tankie.

Maybe I'm wrong tho you tell me. I liked what sankara did and I dont want to negate the cool things he did simply becuase he got murdered and we dont know what he was going to become.

There is nuance in his life that I can accept. But what I cannot accept is modern day MLs who look fondly on the actions of the USSR, russian federation and the modern day CPC. they are large authoritarian states that I cannot support as an anarchist.

Everytime I bring this up tho. I get called a lib.

Thats why i am an anarchist......

Nope. I am just not blindly supporting anyhting called communism.

His country had corruption!

Im sure there is a better way but your acting like having tribunals makes you authoritarian.

It doesn't.

While the term was invented first to describe the event you have stated.

It is also used to describe the actions of the USSR toward the republic of spain during the spainish Civil war. Specifically how the USSR would not openly support the anarchist government fighting a facist coup backed by nazi germany.

Which is my whole point. The USSR was more freindly toward capitalist governments of Briton & USA at the time. Becuase they are a state and it was more benefical for the USSR to not support an active leftist revolution begging for their help.

This is why I use the term Tankie. Hierarchical goverments regaurdless of their economic principles will enevitablly trend toward fascism and authoritairnism. It is only a matter of time. The ussr cpc and other "communists" conuntries are no exception.

Communists have never truly support anarchist.

"Authoritarian" communism is not a real thing. Its some made political compass bullshit

Honestly reading this statement makes me so depressed. It makes me want to call more communist tankies because it fits so well.

Are you so foolish that you don't think a large government ran by a small group of people could not become authoritarian?

Im not a communist, i am an anarchist.

Ok

Lol you used the royal "we" In your original comment.

That's why I said you people.

Your really calling me racist for that?

I will change the way I type ccp to cpc. Thanks.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Communist_Party

Do you people have internet?

I speak of russia generally so I can include USSR and the current state of affairs. I realize they are different but they are both authoritarian.

They be capitalist but they call themselves communists.

What is "authoritarian" communism?

Why dont you google it?

Lmao you acting like im making this word up is the most tankie shit i have ever seen.

Its really the first one tho.

Striaght american men will fight you before they will let water spray on their dirty asses.