[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

It's not about who does it, it's about the objectives of the invasion.

Lol do you hear yourself?

Tankie bullshit friend.

Afghanistan did not want to be invaded. The Afghans fought with the soviets through guerilla warfare for a decade.

You sound just like Americans justifying the US invasion that would happen later.

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Tankie nonsense.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War

The USSR invaded aganistan. Dont worry the USA did too but it tootally isnt imerpialism when the USSR does it right?

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

MLs like you are the reason I am an anarchist.

You asked for more communists i support and I listed some and now Im anti-communist because I don't support the ones who created police states. Were you just waiting for me to engage so you could call that?

Lol you make me want to call more people like you tankies because it is so applicable.

MLs who think the only path to revolution is thru police states, are authoritarian by nature.

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rosa Luxemburg was a marxist who criticized Lenin.

She also accused both Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks of having police state aspirations.

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Also I realize now that The Black panthers were ML and anti imperialst so I support them as well.

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I don't care if you call me tankie !

You seem pretty movtivated in the conversation about me using the term tankie so I think this is bs.

Stop calling me a lib and we can have a conversation.

Are you interested in that?

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I was trolling

Your not doing very good job. Your just coming off as an idiot too me.

Do you think maybe he should have exercised more authority, better strengthened defenses and built up a stronger base for combatting imperialism, that he could have avoided this (I don't have an exact policy path, and it's not like Sankara didn't put down certain reactionary movements when necessary)?

Can you be more concise? Your run on sentences make me want to stop talking to you.

Im not here to go over the specifics of Sankaras's Decisons: But From what I do know. He fought corruption, he pushed literacy programs and fought malnutrition. All While resistsing western imperialsm.

Im sure he made mistakes and did some problematic things. As an anarchist I can appreicate the good things he did and be open to the concept that he also did bad things as well.

Just like the USSR CPC and other communist governments.

I'm sympathetic to Sankara of course, but if your ideal system of resisting authority succumbs to counter-authority, then maybe you don't have grounds to condemn greater authority exercised to these ends.

Your going to have to rewrite, this i dont understand what you are saying. Are you referring to me or Sankara?

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

He came to power via a coup, held military tribunals trying people for corruption, formed armed groups to defend the revolution, and was vehemently against NATO, the IMF, and other western powers.

You think trying people for corruption make you authoritarian?

Are you a liberal?

[-] Sprinklebump@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Am I a tankie? I like socialism but think communism (total state control) is too far.

No you are not a tankie. You are very painfully a liberal.

Please keep reading and understand there is a difference between authoritarian communism and communism

Please see Thomas Sankara.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sankara

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Sprinklebump

joined 1 year ago