For me it was the Joan of Arc thing.
But I think more generally the implied notion that mentally unstable people shouldn't be helped because of art.
For me it was the Joan of Arc thing.
But I think more generally the implied notion that mentally unstable people shouldn't be helped because of art.
Yeah, why should such a thing be regulated?
We all probably still remember the East Palestine accident, but all that turned alright in the end didn't it?
Terrorism works. Good job!
It's a grown up Noogler.
Yeah, I thinks it's partly a cultural thing. I've seen more indian colleagues do this than anyone else.
Or Roxette
Yes, but I guess the improvement is that you can save some power from the wind so you can sail when it dies down.
We used to have another solution to keep the ship moving with no wind, but stupid woke culture put a stop to having hundreds of galley slaves chained to oars on the lower decks.
I believe the correct spelling is "Land of the free^*" ^* terms and conditions may apply
You're getting things completely mixed up.
Meta threatens to leave when they're not allowed to gobble up all the users private data.
Apple threatens to close their services because they can no longer guarantee the privacy of their users, from anybody, if the government forces them to build in back door to snoop on citizens.
See also Apple–FBI encryption dispute.
Government all over the world are trying to outlaw end-to-end encryption and Apple is taking a stand here, because encryption backdoors means an end to legal privacy.
And you probably thinking "well, if you haven't done anything wrong, you've nothing to hide and nothing to fear", right?
Well, who's to say what's wrong? I personally don't think homosexuality or atheism is wrong, but they're capital offences in some countries.
Smoking meats.
I'm the meat chef.
I propose we call this practice "unicorning".
Yes, will the injustices ever stop? Here's a great article about it.