I'm guessing it's a cuckold fetish at this point.

I just saw where Guy Ritchie exclusively used air soft guns on The Covenant because it was right after this.

TL;DR 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up, because cable pushed back on 100 symmetrical.

Why should the shareholders interest even be prioritized. What about customers? Or employees? Or the business itself?

This priority on short term profits for stock price is toxic to functional capitalism.

Are you sure it's firmware or software limited?

I assumed they just kept the lightning controller, which as you said had USB 2.0 speeds, and then hardwired a USB-C adapter into the phone/circuit board. So it's a hardware limit.

Have you thought about adding a legend?

A lot of us use jackett or prowlarr already for radarr/sonarr integration. I use it occasionally to search multiple sites at once and avoid using public torrent sites' front ends.

And then offered to pay for the BOM of the device acting as though that completely makes up for the mistake, ignoring the potential harm to Billets intellectual property.

Then their apology is all butt hurt that they THOUGHT they'd offered to pay for it, but only sent the email internally, not realizing their mistake until called out again. Then whining that no one is giving them the benefit of the doubt when they've demonstrated lack of judgement throughout the whole ordeal.

It doesn't just whine that someone's already answered the question. Oh it has been asked? Then link to the fucking answer!

My biggest pet peeve is when the first Google result for stack overflow is someone bitching at the asker to Google the question.

As a half a pack a day smoker for most of my life, this is what all addicts say.

You're just in denial.

If you can quit whenever you want then why is this worth the fight to you? Because you're addicted.

They help you get through the day because not having them is a stressor. Because you're addicted.

I haven't had a cigarette in like 2 years and they still sound good sometimes. Because I'm addicted.

It won't scale linearly. A lot of those users will be subscribed to subs the instance is already replicating. It would only be new subs that would add to the growth.

I think it's probably more likely HR purposely 'fat fingered' it to pad their minority stats for equal opportunity employment. Maybe I'm just cynical.