[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

u/AngryBeaverBeaver : OP, why do you even bother posting here when 90% of replies are bots?

OP : I'm sorry, but as an AI language model...

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It would be nice to interact with my own family and friends

That's a straight no from me.

We can already interact with our friends and family anywhere we choose, but Lemmy is one of the only general discussion areas left on the internet that isn't full of the stupidest people on the planet.

Bringing our family here will just result in real identities taking over and limiting discussion to what's acceptable in all our little social bubbles.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Even in relatively corruption-free countries, there are often shadow mechanisms the governments uses to decide who they charge with a crime.

Prosecutors can just say they don't have a case, or they can fumble the case purposefully in the initial stages to give credence to the "no case" idea.

We don't have to look any further than how police charge themselves to see how the laws don't fairly apply to everyone. And a simple google search will reveal that Sweden is not immune to police corruption, which shouldn't surprise anyone.

"Disobeying police orders", which is what Thunberg was charged with, is one of those catch-all laws that are purposefully vague in a way that allows police total discretion over how to enforce it.

I guarantee in this case that calls were made all the way up the top of the Swedish government before police decided what to do here.

Basically, my point is that there are so many strings to pull, even in developed countries, that it's often possible to suss out the motivations of the administration just by examining how charges proceed.

What this says about Thunberg getting charged for her actions? Probably nothing significant. Sweden cannot allow activists to freely disrupt their economic infrastructure, especially those involving energy. So they charge her as "normal" regardless of her celebrity status. Though they will be very careful to do everything by the book with so many eyes on the case.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It detects if you're idle and refreshes the page?

That's some horrible attention hacking bullshit.

I'm 100% going to find another instance if I see any content from that nightmare. I'm not on Twitter, or Facebook, for a reason.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I pay a few bucks a month for access to a giant plex share.

It's worth it to just, watch stuff, basically anything, instead of fiddling around with different apps and subscriptions and all that.

I'd happily pay a lot more for the same legal service, but it doesn't exist.

Studios, if you want my money, make everything available in one spot for a reasonable price. Or, continue your bastardization of everything, and I'll just keep watching your stuff anyway.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I believe the only instances that should be defederated are corporate, self-harm, profanely illegal, and political extremist instances.

Anything further than that and the whole network is going to devolve into a series of micro echo chambers.

Or maybe it won't, maybe the vast and free instances will flourish while the restrictive instances die out.

Either way, trying to control a community based on wishy washy ideology is not a good look.

I think in these early days we'll see a lot of power drunk admins who are too eager to push the button, just because they can.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I was gonna say the same thing but then I saw the 2200-something upvotes.

This community is doomed to be exactly like the low effort meme sub r/piracy if people keep upvoting this lazy content.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The only thing you can't do with an open API is exploit every dollar of value that passes through your service.

The main difference between a Silicon Valley API and a FOSS API, is the SV API is trying to get tons of people rich as fuck by exploiting you. The FOSS API can live long and prosper by simply asking for donations every once in a while, or engaging in very light-handed monetization.

There are like a million little nuances to this whole issue, and the lack of nuance is what Silicon Valley relies on to convince people that they must pillage their users, but that's the gist.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

All the VC money is being dumped into AI right now.

Tech companies of yesteryear are starting to have to prove themselves in order to get funding, instead of relying on the wishy washy promises of old.

We can already see with Lemmy, that this phenomenon is giving breathing room to FOSS services.

I think it's awesome, even if we'll have to deal with growing pains for a while.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think the best solution to this whole monetization issue is to just make sharing bandwidth as easy as possible on the fediverse.

If hosting can be done by everyone using an instance, no one entity has to bear overwhelming costs, so there's no excuse to demand money.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They didn't even have a locator beacon, and the sub ran Windows for some insane reason.

I would be amazed if they had a black box.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That page has to be satire... right?

The whole "police your language, so there's no chance anyone could ever be offended" idea is such an oppressive path to a more equal society.

view more: next ›

TechnoBabble

joined 1 year ago