Honestly on so many things, no joke there but the right constantly proposes the democrats as, awesome and great.

It's like

Right: My democratic opponent wants to help the homeless, and make sure average people have a dignified life. and not torture babies for no reason!

People: Hey you know that actually sounds like a good idea

Actual democratic candidate: Those people on the right are slandering me, don't worry I won't make any of your lives easier, and here I'll torture a baby right now to prove this slander wrong!

I mean I guess the concept there though is, isn't making things into gold pointless anyway. We can lab make diamonds too, the jewelry industry works to keep them as a distinct alternate product to protect their slave mined ones. Is the quantity used for electronics enough that it would make a difference in typical manufacturing?

Actually kind of the ironic thing to me based on the time. Did gold have a practical use in the days of alchemy? I mean obviously mass producing gold, basically would have made it completely useless back then, it could make a small group of people very rich, provided they kept the method secret and were careful about how much they sold. It seems like the whole idea was flawed on it's head even if they hadn't based it on completely incorrect basis of the world.

Rabbits are completely incapable of surviving!, see every time we drop a rabbit into an enclosed space filled with wolves, they get eaten, it just proves that only carnivores are able to survive.

Oh hang on we need to drop more herbavores into our carnivore cages because we have to keep propping up these carnivores.

I mean, VR has happened, and been happening for like a decade... is what's not happening that it hasn't replaecd every system and been the only or even primary method of gaming... no. Is it mark zuckerbergs "metaverse" where we start working from home, by wanting to go into a VR virtual workspace or hold our productivity meetings in VR... no obviously not.

Is it a viable option of gaming, along with mobile phone games, PC games, Console games, and portable console games, yes it has a place there right now.

What's dumber is the video origionally was called 1 christian vs 20 atheists, and you see in the video at least one atheist brought up the video title that they all knew before they started. (In other words, Jordan Peterson specifically volunteered to play the christian in a video that when he agreed to it was called, 1 christian vs 20 atheists) Then later demanded they rename the video.

But further its simple, JP preffers to attack people's specific stances, from a nebulous position where he never has to give his own stance because he can't defend his own stance.

Such a facepalming concept, how the hell can boycots be illegal.

Maybe breaking a contract can be illegal, obviously sit ins, and vandalism can be illegal. But no sane person can call not buying something illegal.

Hell isn't that exactly what the capitalist class is supposedly claiming is the one thing that's supposed to guide the free market. IE we don't need regulations, companies wont drop toxic waste in your water, because that would discourage you from buying their products.

exactly, she wasn't saying she was a researcher, she was stating she wasn't an arm chair quarterback... Going with the sports analogy she's far closer to a manager or a coach... not a dude on the couch with just the perspective of what's shown on TV.

I mean, doesn't sound like the challange was the issue, it was actually being guilty of what he was accused of. I mean it could be horrible if AOC is doing something terrible in secret, but at least to my knowledge it's what she's accused of is what she's doing publicly (teaching people their rights).

So... in public actions his 2 main plays were to negate consequences for people who committed violence in his favor.

Then to openly and publicly announce that he's taking away security for others... Guy may as well go on television and say "If some of my supporters were to happen to these guys, I'd probably pardon them".

That seems to be so common of a theme in theirs... Testing narcotics on animals to make predictions of how they impact humans is constantly being used as a chilling and watching animals take drugs". The idea that there's solutions to drug use that might be more effective than throw drug users into private prisons to do slave labor seems quite lost on these people.

Can that jade PC play the classic game WOOD

Reminds me a bit of how carrots became known for helping eyesight. (in short the military claimed carrots helped eyesight so they were feeding them to their anti-aircraft gunners, to hide their mastery of radar).